The Gentle Art of Pants Removal

A Dr. TooToo Medvalli Story
By Oskar Rausch


Part I: The Merger

The press release was three sentences long.

Effective immediately, all U.S. healthcare delivery organizations — public, private, religious, academic, and tribal — have been consolidated into a single national entity: UnitedPeacePartnersAscensionKaiserHealth (UPPAKH). All physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff will retain their roles under a unified contract structure. We thank you for your continued service.

Dr. TooToo Medvalli, MD, FACG, read it three times. The grammar was correct. The logic was sound. The implications were, by his calculation, the end of medicine as a profession capable of being practiced by humans.

He was sitting in his kitchen in Ypsilanti when the email landed. Kai, his German Shepherd, was asleep at his feet, twitching in the way working dogs twitched when they dreamed of doing the only thing they’d been bred for and weren’t allowed to do anymore.

TooToo understood the feeling.

He opened the attached PDF: the Unified Provider Compliance Manual, Volume I of XIV. He read forty-three pages. He noted that the word “patient” appeared eleven times. The word “documentation” appeared 387 times. The word “compliance” appeared 612 times. The word “physician” appeared zero times. The preferred term was “Clinical Documentation Resource (CDR).”

He closed the PDF.

He opened his laptop.

He typed his resignation.

It was four words long: “I will not comply.”

He signed it Dr. TooToo Medvalli, MD, FACG, and then, after a moment’s consideration, he added a third credential he had earned in 1997 and never once used: First-degree black belt, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Gracie Lineage.

He looked at Kai.

“We need a new business plan,” he said.

Kai thumped his tail, twice. This was, by TooToo’s internal scoring system, an enthusiastic endorsement.

Part II: The Silverback

The thing TooToo did not put in his resignation letter, the thing he did not mention to Kai, the thing he had not in fact mentioned aloud to any human being in the four years since it happened, was that he had already, technically, retired from one career before he retired from medicine.

He had retired from Brazilian Jiu Jitsu.

He had not chosen to.

The gym had been on Carpenter Road in Ann Arbor — a Gracie-lineage academy, small, serious, full of men who took the art the way TooToo took everything, which was to say humorlessly and at full intensity. TooToo had trained there for nineteen years. He had earned his black belt in 1997 under an instructor who had earned his under a Gracie. The lineage, by TooToo’s reckoning, was clean.

And then, in the summer of his fifty-fourth year, a new student had walked in.

The new student was twenty-six. He was six-foot-four. He had been a Division I wrestler. He had a neck that did not so much connect his head to his shoulders as continue them. His name, improbably, was Chad. TooToo had attempted to find this surprising and had failed; the world, he had come to understand, was full of Chads who were exactly as Chad-shaped as their names suggested.

Chad worked his way up the food chain of the gym with the methodical, inexorable progress of a glacier. He tapped the blue belts in week one. He tapped the purple belts in week two. He tapped the brown belts in month two. By month three he was rolling with the black belts, and by month four he had tapped all of them except TooToo, who had simply, quietly, begun scheduling his open mats at times he knew Chad would not be there.

TooToo was not afraid of Chad. TooToo was, in his own assessment, “operationally averse to Chad.” He had calculated their physical asymmetry — height, weight, reach, age, hip mobility, recovery time, cortisol levels at baseline — and concluded that any roll between them had an 87% probability of ending in his own submission and a 100% probability of ending in his own next-day soreness.

Eventually, however, the schedule logic broke down, and they rolled.

It lasted ninety seconds.

Chad passed TooToo’s guard like a man stepping over a low fence. He established side control. He transitioned to mount. He cross-faced TooToo with a forearm that smelled like new gym gear and creatine. He took TooToo’s back. He sunk the rear naked choke, and TooToo, his vision graying, tapped.

This, in itself, was not the problem.

The problem was what Chad did next.

Chad stood up. Chad looked down at TooToo, who was still on his hands and knees on the mat trying to remember which direction was up. And Chad said, loudly enough for the entire gym to hear:

“You’re done, old man.”

TooToo, who had spent his entire professional life around men who said things in committee meetings that were technically not insulting but functionally devastating, recognized the tone immediately. It was the tone of a younger primate informing an older primate that the older primate’s tenure at the top of the troop had concluded.

TooToo had read about this.

In 2003, between his internal medicine residency and his gastroenterology fellowship, TooToo had developed an unusual interest in primate ethology. He had read Frans de Waal. He had read Jane Goodall. He had read three separate ethnographies of mountain gorilla troops. He understood, in clinical detail, what happened when a younger silverback challenged an older one. The older silverback would, if he was wise, leave the troop. He would live the remainder of his life on the periphery, foraging alone, maintaining a dignified distance, and avoiding eye contact with the new alpha.

TooToo went home.

He did not return to the gym.

He cancelled his membership by email. His instructor — a fifth-degree black belt who had once driven TooToo to the airport after a tournament — replied with a single line: “Sorry to see you go, brother. The door is always open.”

The door was not always open. The door was, in fact, occupied by Chad.

TooToo, sitting in his kitchen in Ypsilanti, opened a new document on his laptop and titled it: On Beta Dignity: A Marxist Framework for the Defeated Silverback. He wrote 14,000 words in one sitting. He never showed the document to anyone. But he saved it, and he reread it, and from that day forward, in his private internal monologue, he had stopped thinking of himself as a black belt and had started thinking of himself by a different title.

Master Beta.

He thought it was a clever piece of self-deprecation that fused the language of martial arts (Master) with the language of primate ethology (Beta) into a single honorific that acknowledged his place in the hierarchy of the natural world while preserving a kernel of professional dignity.

He did not realize, and would not realize for an embarrassingly long time, what “Master Beta” sounded like said aloud at conversational speed.

Part III: The Invention

TooToo did not believe in retirement. Retirement was, in his estimation, the slow optimization of a human being toward zero throughput. He needed a project. He needed a system. He needed a thing that other humans would pay him to do, that involved no electronic health records, no Mobile Heartbeat app, no green dots indicating availability, and no administrators with Brioni suits and moisturizer.

He made a list of criteria.

  1. No hospital affiliation.
  2. No credentialing committee.
  3. Physical, not digital.
  4. Marxist-compatible (i.e., labor-owned).
  5. Capable of being practiced in a gi kimono, which TooToo found dignified and unflattering in equal measure, traits he valued in clothing.

The list, when assembled, pointed in exactly one direction: a martial arts dojo.

But the existing martial arts were saturated markets. Brazilian Jiu Jitsu had thousands of gyms in every metropolitan area — and besides, returning to BJJ was, for reasons of silverback ethology, foreclosed. Krav Maga had cornered the “anxious dad” demographic. Muay Thai had the cardio crossover. TooToo, applying the same market-segmentation logic that had once made him decide gastroenterology was an undervalued specialty (he was wrong about this, in retrospect, but the logic had been sound), reasoned that he needed a new martial art.

He spent eleven days designing it.

He called it Cu-Clitsu.

The name, he explained later to anyone who would listen, was a portmanteau honoring two opposing principles in combat: the cu, the closed and defensive lower posture (borrowed from a Mandarin character he had misremembered from a college elective), and the clitsu, an invented word that he believed sounded vaguely Japanese and therefore lent the discipline credibility. The fact that the name, said aloud in a North American accent, was vulgar and unfortunate did not occur to TooToo for approximately fourteen months, and even when it was pointed out to him by a horrified Korean-American student, he did not change it, because the LLC had already been filed and the logo printed on 200 gi kimonos.

“The name has equity,” he said. “Equity in branding is non-negotiable.”

The student left and never returned. TooToo logged this as a “non-aligned attrition event” in his spreadsheet, which he maintained personally, in OpenOffice, because he refused to pay for Microsoft.

Part IV: The Dojo

He rented a 2,400-square-foot former tanning salon on a strip mall between a vape shop and a place that sold mattresses to people who did not appear to need mattresses.

The sign read:

CU-CLITSU ACADEMY The Gentle Art of Final Submission Dr. TooToo Medvalli, Sensei (NOT A MEDICAL PROVIDER. THIS IS A MARTIAL ARTS ESTABLISHMENT. DO NOT ASK ME TO REFILL YOUR LISINOPRIL.)

The last line had been added after the third week, during which sixteen separate elderly residents of the surrounding apartment complexes had wandered in asking for prescriptions, blood pressure checks, and, in one memorable case, a vasectomy reversal.

Inside, the dojo was austere. TooToo had insisted on tatami mats, which he had imported from Japan at considerable expense, because the foam interlocking puzzle mats favored by lesser martial arts establishments offended him aesthetically and structurally. The walls were white. There was a single calligraphy scroll, which TooToo had commissioned from a calligrapher on Etsy who he later discovered was an art student in Tulsa. It read, in flowing kanji:

“FROM EACH ACCORDING TO HIS ABILITY, TO EACH ACCORDING TO HIS SUBMISSION.”

He believed this was a clever fusion of Marx and martial philosophy. Most students assumed it said something about honor.

Kai had a designated mat in the corner, on which he watched every class with the alert disinterest of a senior consultant evaluating residents. Students learned, within their first session, that Kai’s tail position was a more reliable indicator of TooToo’s mood than TooToo’s face.

When the academy opened and the first students arrived, they assumed, reasonably, that “Master Beta” was a respectful invented honorific in keeping with the rest of TooToo’s idiosyncratic terminology. They addressed him by it without hesitation. TooToo accepted the title with grave satisfaction. He had them call him Master Beta in opening ceremony. He had them call him Master Beta in closing ceremony. He printed it on the academy’s letterhead.

The students figured it out, on average, by their third class.

No one told TooToo.

It was, by silent and unanimous agreement among the students of the Cu-Clitsu Academy, the funniest thing any of them had ever been a part of, and the preservation of TooToo’s ignorance was a sacred duty none of them would violate. When new students arrived, they were taken aside and told, in low and serious tones: “You call him Master Beta. You say it slow. You say it clear. You never, ever, mention what it sounds like. Do you understand?”

They understood.

Part V: The Curriculum

Cu-Clitsu, as TooToo designed it, had three belts: white, black, and transcendent black. There were no intermediate ranks, because TooToo found the multi-belt system of Brazilian Jiu Jitsu to be a “psychological retention scheme designed to maximize gym revenue at the expense of authentic skill assessment.” Either you could do Cu-Clitsu, or you could not. The middle ground was, in his words, “data-poor.”

The original curriculum consisted of twelve techniques. Eleven of them were straightforwardly adapted from Brazilian Jiu Jitsu — the closed guard, the triangle choke, the kimura, the rear naked choke. TooToo had renamed them in a vaguely militant register he thought sounded revolutionary. The closed guard became “the embrace of the dispossessed.” The kimura became “the wrenching of the bourgeois shoulder.” The rear naked choke became “the silent expropriation.”

The twelfth technique was Cu-Clitsu’s signature move, the one for which the academy would eventually become regionally famous, and which would, six years later, be banned from competitive grappling federations across three states.

TooToo called it: The Final Submission.

It worked as follows.

The practitioner, having established dominant top position on the opponent, would slide his right hand down to the opponent’s hip, locate the waistband of the opponent’s gi pants, secure a deep four-finger grip, and — in a single, explosive, downward-and-outward motion that TooToo had personally calibrated to require 47 to 52 pounds of force depending on gi fabric weight — rip the opponent’s gi pants completely off.

The opponent, finding himself or herself suddenly bottomless on the tatami in front of God and the rest of the class, would experience what TooToo described in his instructional manual as “an immediate and overwhelming psychosocial catastrophe of such magnitude that continued combat becomes psychologically untenable.”

The opponent would then tap.

But not on the mat.

On their own ass.

This was non-negotiable. TooToo had written it into the academy’s bylaws.

Article VII, Section 3: The Final Submission is only valid when the defeated party acknowledges defeat by tapping, three times, audibly, on their own posterior. Tapping the mat, the opponent, or any other surface does not constitute valid submission. The tap on one’s own ass is the formal recognition that the opponent has not merely defeated you, but has, in a deeper sense, made an ass of you. This is the philosophical core of Cu-Clitsu.

TooToo considered this passage the finest piece of writing he had ever produced. He had it framed and hung over the dojo’s front door.

The same general principle, in TooToo’s design, governed every other submission in the academy. The mat tap — the universal language of capitulation in every grappling art on earth — had been abolished entirely at the Cu-Clitsu Academy on the grounds that it was, in TooToo’s words, “evasive of the embodied truth of defeat.” A man who taps the mat is, philosophically speaking, blaming the mat. A man who smacks his own ass is locating the defeat in its proper anatomical seat.

He codified this in the section immediately following.

Article VII, Section 4: For all submission engagements not governed by Section 3, the defeated party shall acknowledge defeat by delivering a single audible smack to his or her own posterior with the free hand. The smack must be loud enough to be heard across the mat by the sensei. Quiet smacks, glancing smacks, and any contact with the mat, the opponent, the gi, or any other surface shall not be recognized as valid submission. In cases where the defeated party’s hands are both immobilized — as commonly occurs in the silent expropriation, the wrenching of the bourgeois shoulder, and the deeper variations of the embrace of the dispossessed — the defeated party shall instead call out, audibly and at full volume, the name of the sensei: “TooToo!” Submission shall be considered effective upon the first such call.

The verbal alternative — the word “TooToo!” shouted by a grown adult, often in a posture of profound physical compromise, often into the tatami, often muffled and slightly damp — was an unintended source of comedy that TooToo did not appreciate but, by the time he understood the dynamic, had become a beloved feature of the academy’s culture. He had considered, briefly, replacing the call with a more dignified alternative — “Yield” had been on the shortlist, as had “Beta” — but he had concluded, after polling the inaugural class, that his name was already established as the verbal submission marker in his students’ procedural memory, and that changing it now would constitute “ritual disruption with no compensating philosophical gain.”

New students were warned in advance, before their first roll, by Dr. Janet Kowalczyk:

“When the choke comes in and you can’t reach your ass — you call him out. Yell the name. Don’t be shy. It is how he knows you are alive.”

Visitors to the strip mall on any given evening, walking past the academy on their way to the vape shop or the mattress place, would frequently hear, drifting out into the parking lot through the propped-open back door:

“TooToo!” “…TooToo!” (smack) “TooToo! — TooToo! — TOOTOO!” (double smack — disqualified — reset)

The vape shop next door had, after the first three months, stopped asking what was going on. The mattress place had developed a theory, which they did not share with TooToo, that the academy was a kind of religious order. They were, in a sense that neither party would have articulated, not entirely wrong.

Part VI: The Students

The Cu-Clitsu Academy attracted, in its first six months, a clientele TooToo had not anticipated but came to appreciate.

There was Brent, a former hospital CFO who had been laid off in the UPPAKH consolidation and was now, in his words, “exploring his physicality.” Brent showed up in lululemon. TooToo gave him a gi. Brent paid in cash. Brent had a great deal of unprocessed rage. Brent took to Cu-Clitsu like a man who had been waiting his entire life to be allowed to rip someone’s pants off.

It was Brent, by the way, who had figured out the Master Beta thing first. He had been on his way home from his third class, in his car, when he replayed the closing ceremony in his head — Thank you, Master Beta. Domo, Master Beta. Master Beta, Master Beta, Master Beta — and the thirty-six repetitions of the phrase in his memory finally collapsed into the obvious phonetic conclusion. Brent had to pull over. Brent laughed for eleven minutes in the parking lot of a Meijer. Brent told no one for two days, until Dr. Janet Kowalczyk arrived to her first class, at which point he took her aside and explained, and a sacred pact was born.

There was Dr. Janet Kowalczyk, a primary care physician who had also quit UPPAKH on principle and was now driving for DoorDash. Dr. Kowalczyk came to Cu-Clitsu twice a week and quietly, methodically, became extremely good at it. She had a particular gift for the Final Submission. TooToo, watching her execute it on Brent for the fourth Tuesday in a row, noted in his ledger: Kowalczyk J. — exceptional pants-removal kinematics. Potential instructor candidate.

There was a man who would only give his name as “Manolo,” who appeared to be in his late seventies, who refused to wear a gi and instead trained in a Members Only jacket, and who, despite TooToo’s repeated insistence that this was against academy policy, was tolerated because he paid in advance for an entire year and never spoke during class.

There was a teenager named Devon whose mother had signed him up after Devon was suspended from school for, in TooToo’s later understanding, “energy-related concerns.” Devon turned out to be the most naturally gifted Cu-Clitsu practitioner TooToo had ever seen. Within four months, Devon could execute the Final Submission in 1.3 seconds from a standing clinch. TooToo gave him a black belt, the first he had ever awarded, and Devon’s mother cried, and TooToo did not know what to do with this, so he gave Kai a treat and looked at the ceiling.

Part VII: The Reckoning

Dr. Marcus Sogmawi had been TooToo’s CMO at the Medical Factory Without a Name, back before the UPPAKH merger, back when there were still separate hospital systems and separate cruelties. Sogmawi was the man who had once strapped TooToo to a chair and forced the Mobile Heartbeat app onto his phone. Sogmawi was the man who, after the UPPAKH consolidation, had been promoted to Regional Vice President of Provider Compliance, Great Lakes Sector, a role for which he was paid $1.4 million annually and which required him to do nothing he could clearly articulate when asked.

Sogmawi walked into the Cu-Clitsu Academy on a Tuesday in October.

He was wearing the suit.

The Brioni.

The moisturizer.

The eyebrows.

TooToo, who had been demonstrating “the wrenching of the bourgeois shoulder” on Brent, was at that moment finishing the lock. Brent — both hands immobilized by the technique, no posterior available to smack — was yelling, audibly and at full volume, the only word the doctrine left him: “TooToo! TooToo! TooToo!” Sogmawi, who had not been warned about Article VII, Section 4, would later report that the first thing he heard upon entering the dojo was a grown man screaming his old colleague’s name into a tatami mat, and that this had, even before the demonstration of the Final Submission, begun a process of psychological recalibration that he had not been prepared for.

TooToo released the lock. Brent collapsed forward, breathing hard, and smacked his own ass once for good measure, which the doctrine did not require but which TooToo silently approved of. Kai stood up. The entire class, which had developed a remarkable group-sensory awareness of TooToo’s emotional states, went silent.

TooToo looked up.

“TooToo,” Sogmawi said.

“Dr. Sogmawi.”

“I heard you were teaching.”

“I am.”

“I came to take a class.”

TooToo studied him. He calculated the man’s weight, his probable cardiovascular fitness (poor), his shoulder mobility (limited by years of desk work and what TooToo suspected were cortisone injections), and his psychological readiness for what was about to happen (zero).

“Classes are sixty dollars,” TooToo said.

Sogmawi handed him three twenties.

“Get a gi from the rack,” TooToo said.

Sogmawi got a gi from the rack. It was a size too small. TooToo did not mention this. Sogmawi changed in the back room. Sogmawi emerged in the gi, looking like a man who had been dressed by people who did not like him.

“Today,” TooToo announced to the class, “we will be demonstrating the Final Submission. Dr. Sogmawi has graciously volunteered to be the demonstration partner.”

Sogmawi had not graciously volunteered. Sogmawi had no idea what the Final Submission was. Sogmawi, who had only ever heard the name “Cu-Clitsu” said aloud in a North American accent, now realized for the first time what the name sounded like, and a small, alarmed look passed across his moisturized face.

It was, TooToo would reflect later, the most honest expression he had ever seen on Sogmawi.

They knelt on the mat.

They bowed.

They engaged.

It lasted four seconds.

TooToo passed Sogmawi’s guard, established side control, transitioned to mount, slid his right hand to the waistband of Sogmawi’s too-small gi pants, secured a deep four-finger grip, and — in a single, explosive, downward-and-outward motion calibrated to 49 pounds of force — executed the Final Submission with what Dr. Janet Kowalczyk would later describe, in the academy’s internal newsletter, as “the surgical precision of a man who had spent thirty years performing colonoscopies on bureaucrats.”

Dr. Marcus Sogmawi, Regional Vice President of Provider Compliance, Great Lakes Sector, lay bottomless on the tatami mat of the Cu-Clitsu Academy, in front of God, Brent, Dr. Janet Kowalczyk, Manolo, Devon, and Kai.

There was a long silence.

TooToo waited.

Sogmawi’s hand moved, slowly, with the resignation of a man who had finally understood that documentation could not save him, that the green dot was meaningless, that the Brioni suit had been a costume, that the moisturizer had been a lie, and that the medical career he had abandoned for the windowless rooms of administration could not now be re-summoned.

He tapped.

Once, twice, three times.

On his own ass.

The sound, audible across the tatami, was — TooToo noted later — exactly correct. Crisp. Three clean strikes. Textbook submission.

TooToo stood. He extended a hand to help Sogmawi up.

Sogmawi took it.

“You used to be a doctor,” TooToo said quietly, as he helped him to his feet. “Now you’re a loser in a gi that doesn’t fit.”

Sogmawi nodded. He didn’t speak. He gathered his pants. He went into the back room. He changed. He left.

He came back the next Tuesday.

And the Tuesday after that.

Part VIII: The Expanded Curriculum

Within his first year of operation, TooToo had expanded the Cu-Clitsu curriculum from twelve techniques to fourteen, adding two drills he considered foundational to the development of what he called “embodied combat readiness.” Both drills were, in TooToo’s assessment, philosophically superior to anything offered in conventional Brazilian Jiu Jitsu academies. Both drills were also, in the assessment of every student who took them, deeply and unforgettably weird.

Drill #13: The Mount Accumulation Round

In conventional grappling, achieving the mount position — sitting astride a supine opponent — is a high-value but uncommon occurrence in any given round. TooToo had calculated, after watching three hundred hours of competition footage, that the average black belt achieved a clean mount in 11% of rounds, with a mean dwell time of 14 seconds.

These numbers, TooToo concluded, were insufficient. The mount was the most dominant ground position in grappling. Therefore, mount achievement needed to be drilled to volume.

He designed the Mount Accumulation Round.

In this drill, a single student stood in the center of the mat and was attacked, in rotation, by every other student in the class, one at a time, in sixty-second rounds. The objective of the central student was to establish mount on each successive attacker as many times as possible within the round. The objective of the attackers was simple: do not get mounted.

TooToo called this drill “Mount Accumulation.”

The students, watching it from the sidelines on the first day TooToo introduced it, called it something else.

The drill, viewed from across the dojo, consisted of a single person rapidly, methodically, and repeatedly climbing on top of a series of other people. The visual rhythm of it — mount, reset, mount, reset, mount, reset — was, in Brent’s later phrasing, “the most uncomfortable thing I have ever willingly paid sixty dollars to do.”

By the second week, the students had a private name for the drill, which they used only when TooToo was not in the room.

They called it the Humping Drill.

TooToo, when he eventually overheard this nickname, frowned for forty seconds, and then said: “Mount Accumulation more precisely describes the biomechanical objective.”

The students nodded.

They continued calling it the Humping Drill.

Drill #14: The Vulnerable Anatomical Strike Rotation

This drill was simpler.

Two students faced one another in seiza, the formal kneeling position. At TooToo’s command, they would, in alternating turns, deliver a single flick — index finger snapped from the thumb, the standard physics-textbook flick — to the opponent’s testicles. The drill continued until one student tapped.

TooToo called this drill “the Vulnerable Anatomical Strike Rotation” in his written curriculum.

He called it, in spoken class, “the nut flick.”

He had concluded, after extensive consideration, that the testicles were the single most underutilized target in modern grappling. The Unified Rules of Mixed Martial Arts prohibited strikes to the groin. Brazilian Jiu Jitsu competitions prohibited strikes to the groin. Wrestling prohibited strikes to the groin. This, to TooToo, was a market inefficiency.

“Real violence,” he explained to the inaugural class, “does not have a ruleset. Real violence has anatomy. We will train for anatomy.”

The drill was painful. The drill was humiliating. The drill was, the students unanimously concluded, ethically dubious. But the drill was, undeniably, effective at producing a generation of Cu-Clitsu practitioners who were exceptionally skilled at flicking testicles and exceptionally vigilant about protecting their own.

Dr. Janet Kowalczyk, who did not have testicles, was exempt from the receiving portion of the drill. She participated only in the delivering portion. She maintained, by the end of her first year, an undefeated record across forty-seven rotations.

Part IX: The Doubter

In the academy’s fourteenth month, a new student arrived who would, by his presence alone, force TooToo to articulate the philosophical core of Cu-Clitsu in a way he had not previously been required to.

His name was Tyler. He was twenty-one. He was a senior at Eastern Michigan University, majoring in something called “Sports Management,” which TooToo did not understand to be a real academic discipline but had decided not to investigate further. Tyler had trained in Krav Maga for two years and had come to Cu-Clitsu because his Krav Maga instructor had retired and the next nearest Krav Maga gym was forty minutes away.

Tyler had a Krav Maga problem, which was that he believed himself to be a person who knew about self-defense.

In his third class, during the Vulnerable Anatomical Strike Rotation, Tyler raised his hand.

“Master Beta,” Tyler said. (He said it slow. He said it clear. Brent, on the sidelines, looked at the ceiling.)

“Yes, Tyler.”

“I have a question about the practicality of this technique.”

TooToo turned to face him fully. Kai, in the corner, lifted his head. The rest of the class, sensing the shift in atmospheric pressure, became very still.

“Proceed.”

“It’s just,” Tyler said, “in a real self-defense situation? Like, on the street? I don’t see how you could ever, like, actually flick somebody in the nuts. Like, you’d have to get really close. And they’d see it coming. And, like, in Krav Maga, we trained palm strikes and elbow strikes and knee strikes to the groin, which are way more powerful and have more reach. The flick, like, it doesn’t have enough force to actually incapacitate. It’s just kind of annoying.”

There was a long silence.

TooToo stepped onto the center of the mat. He gestured for Tyler to stand.

“Tyler,” TooToo said. “Walk with me through a scenario.”

“Okay.”

“You are a college student. You are walking across the Eastern Michigan University campus. It is ten forty-seven at night. You have just left the library. You are crossing the quad. The lighting is poor — the campus has retrofitted to LED, but the bulb above the south walkway has been out for six days. You are walking alone. You are wearing — what are you wearing tonight, Tyler?”

“Uh. Like. A hoodie?”

“You are wearing a hoodie. You are wearing jeans. You are wearing Adidas Sambas, because you are twenty-one years old in 2026 and that is what you wear. You have your backpack on both shoulders, which is correct for postural reasons but tactically suboptimal because it limits your shoulder mobility.”

“Okay.”

“A man approaches you. He is taller than you. He is heavier than you. He is, by your own visual assessment, a Chad.”

Brent, on the sidelines, made a sound.

“The Chad approaches you with intent. He asks you for your wallet. He has one hand in his jacket pocket. You cannot see whether he is armed. The street is empty. The library is two hundred meters behind you. Your phone is in your hoodie pocket. The nearest blue-light emergency station is forty meters to your left, but the Chad is positioned between you and the station.”

“Okay.”

“Tyler. In this scenario. With your training. What is your move?”

Tyler thought about it.

“Palm strike to the nose. Then knee to the groin. Then I run.”

TooToo nodded slowly.

“And what is the distance between you and the Chad when you initiate the palm strike?”

“Like, three feet.”

“Three feet. And what is the Chad’s reaction time, given that he is also aware that you might attempt a self-defense maneuver, because he has approached you with hostile intent and is therefore in a state of heightened vigilance?”

“I don’t know. Fast.”

“Fast. And if the Chad’s right hand is, as you have stipulated, in his jacket pocket — what is in that pocket?”

“A knife, maybe. Or a gun.”

“A knife or a gun. Tyler. You have just told me, in your scenario, that you will close to three feet of a man who may have a knife or a gun, and you will attempt to strike his face with your palm. This is a decision tree with seventeen branches, and fourteen of them end with you in an ambulance.”

Tyler said nothing.

“Now,” TooToo said. “Consider the alternative.”

He raised his right index finger. He cocked it against his thumb. He held it up for the class to see.

“The Chad approaches. He asks for your wallet. You appear to comply. You reach toward your pocket — but as you do, you step forward, not back, into the Chad’s personal space. He does not expect this. Humans expect prey to flee. You are not fleeing. You are closing distance. The Chad’s processing speed slows by two hundred milliseconds while his prefrontal cortex attempts to reconcile your unexpected behavior with his predatory script. In that two-hundred-millisecond window — Tyler, what is the most unexpected, most disorienting, most fundamentally identity-disrupting thing you can do to a hostile male stranger?”

Tyler stared.

“Flick his nuts?”

“Flick his nuts.”

“But — Master Beta — even if it works, like, it just kind of hurts him a little. It doesn’t put him down.”

“Tyler.” TooToo lowered his finger. “You are misunderstanding the technique because you are thinking like a Krav Maga student. You are thinking the goal is to incapacitate the attacker. The goal is not to incapacitate the attacker. The goal is to break the social contract of violence.”

He let that sit.

“When a Chad approaches a college student in a dark quad, there is an implicit script. The Chad threatens. The student complies, or flees, or fights. These are the three branches the Chad has prepared for. The Chad has not prepared for being flicked in the testicles. The flick is too small to register as a serious attack. The flick is too intimate to register as a normal defensive maneuver. The flick exists in a psychological category for which the Chad has no script.”

TooToo paused.

“The Chad does not feel pain. The Chad feels confusion. He looks down. His brain attempts to reconcile what has just happened. Did this person just flick me in the testicles? Why? Is this a joke? Is this real? Am I being recorded? In the four to six seconds of cognitive dissociation that follow, you are no longer in front of him. You are forty meters to the left, at the blue-light station. The Chad is still looking down.”

He turned to the class.

“This is the principle. This is why we train the nut flick. We do not train it for force. We train it for category violation. The Final Submission works on the same principle. The mount accumulation works on the same principle. Every technique in this academy is designed not to defeat the opponent’s body but to defeat the opponent’s script.”

He turned back to Tyler.

“Krav Maga teaches you to win a fight. Cu-Clitsu teaches you that fights are stories the attacker is telling himself, and the fastest way to end a fight is to make the story unrecoverable.”

Tyler was quiet for a long moment.

“That’s actually… kind of brilliant?”

“It is brilliant,” TooToo said. “I have written 14,000 words on it.”

He turned and walked back to the front of the mat. Kai, in the corner, lowered his head.

“Continue the rotation.”

The class continued the rotation. Tyler flicked. Tyler was flicked. Tyler smacked his own ass — too quietly the first time, was made to do it again, smacked it correctly the second time — re-engaged, and flicked again. By the end of class he had been flicked seventeen times and had smacked his own ass seventeen times and had flicked his partners sixteen times, and as he walked out to the parking lot in the cold October air, he was, he would later admit to his roommate, deeply confused about whether he had just received the worst or the best martial arts instruction of his life.

The next Tuesday, he came back.

He always came back.

Part X: The Field Test

It happened nineteen days after the doubter scene.

Tyler was walking across the Eastern Michigan University quad. It was ten fifty-three at night. He had just left the library. He was wearing a hoodie. He was wearing jeans. He was wearing Adidas Sambas. The bulb above the south walkway had been out for now twenty-five days because the campus facilities ticket was, like everything, downstream of a documentation backlog.

The street was empty.

The blue-light station was forty meters to his left.

A man stepped out from behind the bronze statue of the university’s founder.

He was taller than Tyler. He was heavier than Tyler. He had one hand in his jacket pocket. He asked for Tyler’s wallet.

Tyler stopped walking.

A great calm descended upon Tyler. He had, in the nineteen days since the doubter scene, replayed TooToo’s parable approximately six hundred times. He had visualized the scenario in the shower, in lecture, on the elliptical at the campus rec center, falling asleep at night. He had developed, over those nineteen days, a deep and unshakable certainty that this exact moment would come, and that when it did, he would not flee, and he would not comply, and he would not do anything Krav Maga had taught him.

He would do Cu-Clitsu.

He would do it correctly.

What followed, the officers who reviewed the body camera footage would later agree, was not something any of them had been trained to interpret.

Tyler did not run.

Tyler dropped his backpack.

Tyler executed a forward shoulder roll — a movement he had not been formally taught at the academy but which he had seen on a YouTube video about aikido and which he believed lent the proceedings a sense of ceremonial gravity — and came up in seiza, the formal kneeling position, in the middle of the quad, on the wet October grass.

The assailant stopped moving.

The assailant’s hand came halfway out of his jacket pocket and then went back in.

Tyler bowed, from the waist, deeply.

“I accept your challenge,” Tyler said.

The assailant said: “What?”

“Sir,” Tyler said, “before we engage, the rules of Cu-Clitsu require mutual anatomical accessibility. I must respectfully request that you remove your jeans.”

There was a silence on the quad of a quality that Eastern Michigan University had not previously hosted.

“Are you on something?” the assailant said.

“I am training. I have been training for fourteen weeks. Please remove your jeans, sir.”

“I’m not — I’m trying to rob you.”

“I understand. I am offering you the opportunity to do so under fair conditions. Fight like a man!”

The assailant looked around the quad. He was looking, the officers would later determine, for any other human being who could confirm that this was actually happening. He found none. He looked back at Tyler, who was still kneeling, who was still bowed forward, who was waiting.

“I’m leaving,” the assailant said.

He turned to walk away.

This, Tyler would later explain to the officers, was the trigger.

In Cu-Clitsu doctrine, a refusal to engage by a hostile party who has initiated contact constitutes what TooToo termed “asymmetric script abandonment” — the attacker attempts to leave the situation while the defender remains in a posture of formal engagement. Doctrine prescribed a single response: the defender must close distance and impose terminal submission.

Tyler stood up.

He covered the distance to the assailant in three strides.

He established side-clinch.

He passed to side-control standing — a transition the academy had never formally drilled in a vertical context but which Tyler intuited under pressure.

He slid his right hand down to the waistband of the assailant’s jeans, secured a deep four-finger grip, and — in a single, explosive, downward-and-outward motion that TooToo would later, watching the body cam footage, estimate at 54 pounds of force, slightly excessive but appropriate to the heavier denim of street pants versus standard gi fabric — executed the Final Submission.

The assailant’s jeans came off in one pull.

The assailant froze.

The assailant looked down.

The assailant’s brain attempted to reconcile what had just happened.

He was on the quad. He was in his underwear. His pants were in the grass eight feet away. A college student was kneeling in front of him, again, having returned to seiza. The college student was looking up at him with what could only be described as patience.

“Sir,” Tyler said. “Please kneel.”

The assailant — and this is the part that, when Brent later watched the body cam footage at the academy’s Tuesday social, made him laugh so hard he had to be given water — the assailant knelt.

He knelt because his entire psychological framework for “what is happening to me right now” had collapsed, and the only available script was the script being offered by the very calm young man in front of him, who appeared to know what came next.

Tyler bowed.

The assailant, after a long pause, bowed back.

Tyler raised his right index finger. He cocked it against his thumb.

He flicked.

The flick connected, through the assailant’s underwear, with what TooToo’s curriculum precisely termed the Vulnerable Anatomical Convergence.

The assailant made a sound.

Tyler paused, three seconds, as the rotation required.

He flicked again.

He paused.

He flicked again.

By the fourth flick, the assailant had begun to cry. Not from pain — the flicks, by force, were minor. He was crying from a deeper place. He was crying, the police psychologist would later note in his report, from “a fundamental disorientation regarding the nature of his own ongoing life experience.”

By the seventh flick, the campus police arrived.

The body cam footage, which would eventually be subpoenaed by the Detroit Free Press under FOIA and would form the basis of the headline that turned the Cu-Clitsu Academy from a regional curiosity into a national one, captured the following scene:

Two officers, badges visible, weapons holstered, illuminated by the bouncing beams of their flashlights, rounding the corner of the library at a brisk walk. Their flashlights converging on the quad. The footage steady, then pausing, then dropping a foot as the lead officer — Officer Patricia Holzhauer, eleven years on the force — physically stopped walking.

What the flashlights illuminate:

A college student, in a hoodie, in seiza, on wet grass, flicking — methodically, with perfect three-second intervals — the underwear-clad testicles of a pantless adult male who is kneeling in front of him, sobbing softly, and not attempting to leave.

Officer Holzhauer’s microphone captures her saying, very quietly:

”…the fuck.”

Then, louder:

“SIR. STEP AWAY FROM THE GENTLEMAN.”

Tyler froze, his right hand still cocked for the eighth flick. He turned his head, slowly, toward the officers. He bowed, still kneeling. He stood. He placed his hands behind his back, palms outward, in the posture TooToo had drilled the academy in as “non-threatening compliance presentation.”

“Officer,” Tyler said. “I am performing a defensive Cu-Clitsu protocol on a hostile assailant.”

There was a silence.

“You’re performing a what.”

“Cu-Clitsu.”

Officer Holzhauer’s body cam catches her partner, Officer Greg Mendel, leaning over and whispering: “Did he just say what I think he said?”

Officer Holzhauer’s response, also audible: “Greg, I do not know what is happening right now.”

“Could you say that again, slower?” she said to Tyler.

“Coo,” Tyler said. “Clit. Soo.”

“Sir, are you under the influence of any substances tonight?”

“No, ma’am. I am a brown belt candidate at the Cu-Clitsu Academy on Carpenter Road. This man” — he gestured at the pantless, kneeling, crying assailant — “approached me with the apparent intent to rob me. I engaged the standard defensive protocol. The protocol is now ninety percent complete. May I finish the rotation?”

“NO,” said Officer Holzhauer. “No, you may not finish the rotation. Step away from the gentleman. Sir — the other sir — please stand up. Get your pants. Please get your pants, sir. Sir, why are you crying.”

The pantless man, through tears: “I don’t know what just happened.”

“Did this young man assault you?”

”…I don’t know.”

“Sir, did you intend to rob this young man?”

”…I don’t know.”

Officer Holzhauer turned slowly to look at Tyler. Tyler met her eyes with the still composure of a man who had, against all probability, executed the technique exactly as it had been taught.

She keyed her radio.

“Dispatch. This is Holzhauer. I’m going to need a supervisor at the EMU quad. And, uh. Maybe a psych consult. For both of them.”

Tyler was taken to the campus police station for what the officers — who could not, in good faith, charge him with assault, because the alleged victim could not articulate what had happened or whether he had been the aggressor — termed a “voluntary interview.”

He was allowed one phone call.

He scrolled to the top of his contacts, which were arranged alphabetically, and which placed at the very top, before “Aaron – Roommate” and “Amazon Customer Service,” a single entry under the letter M:

Master Beta — EMERGENCY

He pressed call.

TooToo answered on the second ring.

“Yes.”

“Master Beta. It’s Tyler.”

There was a pause.

“You used the technique.”

“How did you —”

“Why else would you be calling at this hour. Are you injured.”

“No, Master Beta.”

“Are you in custody.”

“I’m at the campus police station. They said it’s a voluntary interview.”

“On my way.”

The phone clicked.

Forty-six minutes later, Dr. TooToo Medvalli walked into the lobby of the Eastern Michigan University campus police station. He was wearing his calligraphy-embroidered black gi, because he had been in the middle of the academy’s Tuesday evening solo drilling session when Tyler called and had not bothered to change. He had Kai on a leash, because he had not bothered to drop the dog at home. Kai, a working dog with twelve years of training and an impeccable sense of context, walked into the police station with the composed disinterest of a senior officer attending an unfortunate situation.

Officer Holzhauer, at the front desk, looked up.

She did not speak for several seconds.

“Are you,” she finally said, “the sensei.”

“I am the Master Beta,” TooToo said.

”…Could you say that again, slower?”

“I am the Master Beta.”

Officer Holzhauer’s mouth moved silently. She turned to her monitor. She turned back.

“Right. Yeah. Okay. He’s in interview room two.”

What was said in interview room two has never been disclosed, because Tyler did not record it and TooToo, on principle, did not own a smartphone capable of recording. But forty minutes after TooToo entered the room, the door opened, and Tyler walked out with TooToo behind him, and behind them came Officer Holzhauer, who had the expression of a woman who had been forced, against her will, to update her model of reality.

No charges were filed.

The alleged assailant — whose name was never released, and who had a prior for petty theft — declined to press charges. He declined, also, to give a statement to the press. He declined to ever return to the EMU campus. He declined, in fact, to ever again attempt to mug anyone, and would eventually, three years later, become a moderately successful sales representative for a flooring company in Toledo.

In the parking lot of the police station, under the orange wash of a sodium-vapor streetlight that the EMU facilities team had not yet retrofitted, Tyler and TooToo stood with Kai between them.

“Master Beta,” Tyler said. “I have one question.”

“Proceed.”

“Was — was that right? Did I do it right?”

TooToo considered the question. He looked at Tyler. He looked at the streetlight. He looked at Kai, who had sat down on the asphalt and was watching a moth.

“You did not need to remove the jeans,” TooToo said. “The flick can be administered through standard denim. The drill we practice in the academy uses gi pants because gi pants are part of formal training attire, not because denim is impermeable. You added a step the doctrine does not require.”

“Oh.”

“However.”

TooToo turned to face him fully.

“You added a step that demonstrated formal commitment to the philosophical seriousness of the engagement. You refused to engage under unfair conditions. You insisted that the attacker meet you on equal anatomical terms. This is a deepening of the doctrine I had not previously articulated. I will be adding it to the curriculum.”

Tyler’s eyes filled.

“Also: you should not have dropped into seiza on wet grass. You will get a urinary tract infection. The tatami is a controlled surface for reasons of hygiene as well as kinetics. Next time, remain standing until tatami-equivalent footing is available.”

“Yes, Master Beta.”

“Also: the bow at the beginning was excessive. A nod is sufficient when the opponent has not yet acknowledged a formal match.”

“Yes, Master Beta.”

“Tyler.”

“Yes, Master Beta?”

TooToo placed one hand on Tyler’s shoulder. The gesture was so unfamiliar to him — physical contact initiated for emotional purposes — that he had to consciously instruct his hand to perform it, like a man operating a piece of unfamiliar machinery from a manual.

“The technique performed exactly as designed.”

Tyler began to cry.

Kai, on the asphalt, stopped watching the moth and looked up.

TooToo, who did not understand why his student was crying but had learned, over the past fourteen months of running a martial arts academy, that emotional displays of this kind were typically followed by gratitude and did not require him to do anything except wait, waited.

Eventually Tyler stopped crying.

They walked to their cars.

Part XI: The Diagnosis

The question came in the second year of the academy, on a Thursday in March, from a student who had been training for eleven months. Her name was Priya. She was twenty-eight. She had a PhD in clinical psychology and had taken up Cu-Clitsu, by her own report, because her therapist had recommended a physical hobby and she had selected, from the available local options, the most interesting one. Priya was thoughtful. Priya asked good questions. Priya had been waiting, TooToo would realize later, for the right moment to ask the question she actually wanted to ask.

The moment came at the end of class, after the bow to Kai’s urn, in the empty dojo, while TooToo was wiping down the mats and Priya was the last student left in the changing area.

“Master Beta,” she said. (Slow. Clear. The pact unbroken.)

“Yes, Priya.”

“Can I ask you a clinical question?”

“You may ask.”

“Why did you build a martial art whose entire structure is about the controlled, ritualized humiliation of one party by another, with the humiliated party formally requesting the humiliation, performing a public bodily acknowledgment of it, and then immediately returning for more?”

TooToo stopped wiping the mat.

He stood up, slowly.

He looked at Priya.

He looked at the calligraphy scroll. He looked at Kai’s urn. He looked at the framed Article VII, Section 3. He looked at the rack of gi kimonos with the academy’s logo printed on the breast.

He sat down on the mat.

He did not speak for almost a full minute.

Then he said, in the flat analytical register he used for diagnoses: “I have been asked this question before. The previous times, the asker was angry, or sarcastic, or attempting to provoke me. You are not. You are asking it sincerely.”

“Yes.”

“Then I will answer it sincerely.”

He folded his hands in his lap. He looked at the wall, not at her, because the answer was easier to assemble in the absence of an interlocutor’s eyes.

“I spent thirty-one years in academic medicine,” he began.

He had been a medical student, then an intern, then a resident, then a chief resident, then a fellow, then an attending, then an associate professor with a sub-specialty appointment in gastroenterology at a Big Ten university. He had taught fourteen incoming residency classes. He had served as program director for six of them. He had not noticed, until very recently — until this moment, possibly, until Priya had asked her question — what kind of structure he had spent three decades operating inside.

The dynamic in a teaching hospital, viewed from outside, would be unrecognizable as legitimate work to almost any other industry. The residents arrived at 4 a.m. The residents pre-rounded for two hours. The residents presented their patients to the chief resident, who, having been a resident himself sixteen months ago, took particular pleasure in identifying every gap, every miscalculation, every imperfectly-cited reference. The residents then re-presented to the attending, who took further pleasure — different in flavor, more sophisticated, fully matured — in finding errors that the chief resident had missed. The attending would lean back in his chair. The attending would steeple his fingers. The attending would say, in the cultivated tone of a man who has waited his entire career for this exact opportunity:

“Take me through your reasoning again, Doctor.”

And the resident would take him through the reasoning again, and the reasoning would not survive scrutiny, and the resident’s voice would become smaller, and the resident’s face would flush, and the attending’s eyes would light up.

“This is the part I want to be precise about,” TooToo said to Priya. “Because I was on both sides of this for three decades, and I have only recently understood, in retrospect, the quality of the light.”

The look in the professor’s eyes, when the resident’s reasoning collapsed, was not warm. It was not curious. It was not pedagogical. It was, TooToo said, searing. It was gleeful. It was the look of a man who had been waiting all morning for this exact moment, who would be telling this story at the residency program directors’ dinner that night, who would be using the resident’s name with affection but in the tone of a man describing a fish he had landed.

And the resident, on the receiving end of that look, would say — was required to say, ritually, doctrinally, before the morning was over — “Thank you, Dr. Henderson. May I take one more patient?”

And Dr. Henderson would assign three more patients, and the resident, who had not slept in twenty-six hours, would say:

“Thank you.”

The whole exchange, TooToo had finally come to understand, was a scene. It had blocking. It had a script. It had a recurring cast. It had emotional beats that were, for the senior party, deeply satisfying, and for the junior party, formative in ways that were not entirely about clinical education. The residents, in their third or fourth year, after they had survived enough of these encounters, would begin to inflict identical scenes on the residents below them. They would not see themselves doing this. They would describe it, in their own minds, as teaching. They would describe the eyes-lighting-up moment as helping.

The structural resemblance to a particular genre of adult content was, TooToo said to Priya, who was sitting now on the mat across from him with her chin on her hand, not subtle. It was, in fact, exact. Strip away the white coats and the EHR and the patient on the gurney, and what remained was: a clothed authority figure deriving observable, searing pleasure from inflicting controlled, ritualized degradation upon a subordinate, while the subordinate, in turn, requested more.

It was, TooToo said, a porn scene without nudity. The OR was the set. The patient was the prop. The work product was the proof of consummation. The white coat was the costume.

He had been on both sides of this dynamic for thirty-one years.

He had been the resident saying “thank you, may I have another patient,” and he had been the attending whose eyes had lit up. He had not, at the time, identified his own eyes as lighting up. He had identified himself as teaching and maintaining standards and not letting the next generation get away with what we got away with. He had used those phrases, in committee meetings, with absolute conviction, for two decades.

He had, in retrospect, been having a great time.

“The Cu-Clitsu Academy,” TooToo said, “is the same dynamic. With the lying removed. The hierarchy is named. The submission is named. The humiliation is named. The pleasure I take in administering a demonstration on a man like Sogmawi is not different, in any psychological respect, from the pleasure my old mentor took in destroying me in the OR in 1993, while the scrub nurse silently re-counted the laps and the medical student pretended to look at the monitor. The only difference is that everyone in the dojo knows what is happening. The mentor in 1993 did not know, or knew and did not say, or said and called it teaching. I, in 2026, call it Cu-Clitsu, and the students smack their own asses, and Brent screams my name into the tatami, and everyone, in the end, signs up voluntarily.”

He paused.

“That is the answer to your question.”

Priya looked at him for a long moment.

“That’s a pretty good answer,” she said.

“Thank you.”

“Have you written this down?”

“I wrote one sentence.”

“What was the sentence?”

TooToo did not normally share things he had written privately. The 14,000-word essay on beta dignity had been read by no one. The criterion list had been seen by no one. The single sentence in the back of his curriculum notebook had been seen by no one.

He told Priya the sentence.

“The dojo is the academic medical center, with the lying removed.”

Priya nodded slowly.

“You should write more.”

“I should not.”

“Why?”

TooToo considered.

“Because the value of the dojo, as I have come to understand it, is that it is the embodied form of a truth that loses its function when articulated. The residents in the OR did not need to be told what was happening. They needed to be inside it, in their bodies, repeatedly, until they understood. The students here are the same. The doctrine, the smacks, the rotations — these are not the message. These are the medium. To articulate the medium would be to dissolve it.”

Priya stood up. She bowed.

“Thank you, Master Beta.”

“You are welcome, Priya.”

She left.

TooToo finished wiping the mats.

He went home and did not write a single additional word about it for the rest of his life.

Epilogue

The Detroit Free Press article ran on the front page of the Metro section eleven days later, after a records request unsealed the body cam footage. The headline read:

“EMU STUDENT FOILS MUGGER WITH OBSCURE MARTIAL ART; POLICE, ALLEGED VICTIM EQUALLY UNABLE TO EXPLAIN”

The article quoted TooToo, who agreed to a single phone interview against the better judgment of his student-base, as follows:

“The technique is not designed to incapacitate. The technique is designed to render the attacker’s situation narratively unrecoverable. The flick is not the weapon. The category violation is the weapon.”

The reporter, in a parenthetical, noted: “Dr. Medvalli, who insisted on being referred to throughout the interview as ‘Master Beta,’ declined to elaborate on the etymology of the academy’s name.”

Within two weeks of the article’s publication, the Cu-Clitsu Academy on Carpenter Road had a waitlist of two hundred and fourteen students. TooToo did not raise prices. He did, however, order an additional shipment of tatami mats.

Tyler received his first stripe on the Tuesday after the article was published. He cried again. Kai watched.

The academy’s signage evolved over the following years, layering revisions like sediment until the front board read, in full:

CU-CLITSU ACADEMY The Gentle Art of Final Submission Dr. TooToo Medvalli, Sensei (Master Beta) (NOT A MEDICAL PROVIDER. THIS IS A MARTIAL ARTS ESTABLISHMENT. DO NOT ASK ME TO REFILL YOUR LISINOPRIL.) WALK-INS WELCOME. ADMINISTRATORS HALF-OFF. AS FEATURED IN THE DETROIT FREE PRESS.

The half-off discount for administrators was real. TooToo offered it because, as he explained to a reporter from the local alt-weekly whose profile was eventually killed by UPPAKH’s media affiliate, “the administrators need it the most, and they have the most to lose, which makes their final submission the most pedagogically valuable for the rest of the class.”

Dr. Marcus Sogmawi kept coming. He came every Tuesday. He came every Thursday. He came on Saturdays for open mat. By his eighteenth month, he had stopped wearing the Brioni anywhere — not to the dojo, not to the office, not anywhere. He had begun wearing flannel shirts and unironed khakis, which he bought from a Costco in Romulus and which fit him in a way the Brioni never had. In his twenty-fourth month, he resigned from UPPAKH. The resignation was four words long. He had borrowed the formula.

He and Dr. Janet Kowalczyk opened a small primary care clinic together on a side street in Ypsilanti. The clinic operated on a sliding scale. It accepted no insurance. It used paper charts. It had no app. It had a green plant in the waiting room that Janet remembered to water and a coffee maker that Sogmawi remembered to clean. The patients liked them both.

TooToo did not attend the opening, because TooToo did not attend openings, but he sent Kai with a card.

The card said: From each according to his ability.

Kai died in the spring of the academy’s third year. He was thirteen and a half. He died on his designated mat in the corner of the dojo, in his sleep, between the Tuesday evening fundamentals class and the Thursday morning conditioning class, in a position that suggested he had been comfortable. TooToo found him in the morning. TooToo did not teach class that day. He cancelled the week.

He had Kai cremated. The urn sits on a shelf above the calligraphy scroll. Every class begins and ends, now, with a bow to the urn.

On the wall next to the calligraphy, there is a small framed photograph.

It is a photo of Dr. Marcus Sogmawi, on the day he received his black belt, two and a half years after his first class. He is smiling. He is in a properly fitted gi. He is holding a paper chart.

Below the photograph, in TooToo’s careful handwriting, is the caption:

Patient zero. Recovered.

Devon won the inaugural Midwest Open in his weight class. Manolo never spoke. Brent eventually opened a satellite academy in Toledo and refused, on principle, to ever call TooToo anything other than Master Beta, said clearly and slowly, with full ceremonial weight, every time.

Tyler graduated from EMU with a degree in Sports Management and went to work, against all expectation, as a public defender’s investigator in Wayne County. He had decided, somewhere in the long quiet hours after the quad, that his real interest was not in incapacitating people but in giving them, when their lives had been narratively shattered, a script to kneel into.

He still trains. He has not yet earned his black belt. He is patient. He has time.

— Fin. —

The Glorious Republic of Zebsilanti: A History


By Oskar Rausch

Being a True and Accurate Account of the Founding of the World’s Smallest Landlocked Nation, as Told by the Ministry of Information and Shawarm

Second Printing, with Additional Materials from the Archives of the People’s Tribunal


PART ONE: GENESIS

The revolution began, as most revolutions do, over garbage.

Not metaphorical garbage—the spiritual refuse of tyranny or the moral detritus of oppression—but actual garbage. Specifically, the thirty-seven Hefty bags that had accumulated behind the Al-Kareem Family Restaurant over a period of six weeks while Ypsilanti Charter Township debated whether waste management fell under “essential services” or “quality of life amenities.”

“Essential,” argued Supervisor Peb Stumbles, “implies necessity. People want their garbage picked up. But do they need it?”

The motion to table the discussion passed 4-3.

This was, it should be noted, the seventeenth consecutive year that Peb Stumbles had served as Township Supervisor. This was also the seventeenth consecutive year that Peb Stumbles had been the only name on the ballot for Township Supervisor. These two facts were not unrelated.

The ballot, in Ypsilanti Township, was less an instrument of democracy and more a formality—a rubber stamp applied to decisions that had already been made by virtue of no one else wanting the job, or perhaps by virtue of no one else knowing the job existed, or perhaps by virtue of a political machine so perfectly optimized that it had eliminated the inefficiency of opposition entirely.

“Are you running for Supervisor?” residents would be asked, every four years, by a canvasser who already knew the answer.

“Is anyone else running?” residents would reply.

“Peb Stumbles is running.”

“Then no.”

And so Peb Stumbles would win, again, with the kind of margins that would make autocrats blush—not through fraud or intimidation, but through the simple expedient of being the only option. She had never faced an opponent. She had never needed to campaign. She had never, in seventeen years, been required to explain to voters why she deserved their support, because “deserved” implied a choice, and choice implied alternatives, and alternatives did not exist.

Her platform, such as it was, consisted of continuing to do whatever she had been doing, which was difficult to evaluate because no one was entirely sure what that was.

“What does the Township Supervisor actually do?” Farid Mansour had asked once, at a community meeting.

“Administrative oversight,” Peb Stumbles had replied.

“Of what?”

“Township functions.”

“Which functions?”

“The ones that require oversight.”

The conversation had not progressed further. Farid had left with the distinct impression that he had learned nothing, which was, in its own way, informative.


To be fair, Ypsilanti Charter Township did technically have waste collection. Waste Management—the company, not the concept—arrived weekly to collect trash with the reliability of a metronome. The trash service was, in fact, adequate.

The recycling was another matter.

Recycling collection occurred every other week, on a schedule that seemed to have been designed by someone who had never seen an Amazon box. In the intervening fourteen days, a typical household would accumulate:

  • 4-7 Amazon boxes (Prime membership being the only reliable service in the township)
  • 2-3 Chewy boxes (for residents whose pets ate better than they did)
  • 1 HelloFresh box (abandoned after the second week, but the boxes kept coming)
  • Miscellaneous cardboard from Target, Walmart, and the inexplicable number of things that now arrived in boxes instead of being purchased at stores that no longer existed

By day ten, the recycling bin was full. By day twelve, residents faced a choice: store cardboard in their garages like hoarders preparing for an apocalypse, or simply throw it in the trash.

Most chose the trash.

“It’s still going to a landfill anyway,” residents told themselves, which was probably true but felt like a moral failing nonetheless.

The result was that Waste Management’s weekly trash collection had become, in effect, trash-and-recycling collection, while the biweekly recycling pickup serviced bins that were either overflowing (for the optimists) or empty (for the realists who had given up). The recycling truck would roll through the neighborhood, lift bins that contained a single flattened cereal box and three wine bottles, and move on—a ghost service, a vestigial limb of environmental aspiration.

The thirty-seven Hefty bags behind Al-Kareem’s included at least fifteen bags that were exclusively cardboard—Amazon boxes, mostly, broken down and stuffed into bags because the recycling bin had been full since the Carter administration.

“We could take it to the recycling center ourselves,” Omar had suggested once.

“The recycling center is in Ann Arbor.”

“So?”

“It closes at 4 PM. On weekdays. And it’s not open on the weekends when people actually have time.”

The cardboard went in the trash. The trash accumulated. The revolution approached.


Meanwhile, on the same evening as the garbage debate, Farid Mansour received his eleventh citation for “unmaintained vegetation exceeding 7.5 inches” from a man in cargo shorts who had materialized from behind a Honda Odyssey with a tape measure and the dead eyes of a community college adjunct who had made precisely one consequential decision in his life and intended to enforce it absolutely.

“But my neighbor—” Farid gestured toward a property that could charitably be described as “where lawnmowers go to die” and less charitably as “evidence.”

“Not my assigned block,” said the man, who was technically named Gerald but whom history would remember only as “Cargo Shorts.” He wrote the ticket with a mechanical pencil. The graphite was 0.5mm. He’d specified this at Staples.

Gerald was a “volunteer ordinance officer,” which meant he had no salary, no training, and no accountability—only a clipboard, a measuring tape, and the burning conviction that grass height was a moral issue. He had applied for the position after retiring from a middle-management role at a company that no longer existed, and he had been given the clipboard without interview, background check, or psychological evaluation.

“We need more community involvement,” Peb Stumbles had said, when the volunteer ordinance program was announced. “This empowers residents to take ownership of their neighborhoods.”

What it actually empowered was Gerald, specifically, to take ownership of everyone else’s lawns.

The program had no oversight. There was no appeals process. There was no way to contest a citation except by attending a Township board meeting, which occurred on the third Tuesday of every month at 4:30 PM—a time carefully chosen to ensure that anyone with a job could not attend.

“Why 4:30?” a resident had once asked.

“It’s when the board is available,” Peb Stumbles had replied.

“But residents aren’t available at 4:30. We’re at work.”

“Then they should prioritize.”

The resident had not prioritized. No one prioritized. The meetings were attended by Peb Stumbles, the four board members who had also run unopposed, and occasionally Gerald, who came to report on his enforcement activities with the enthusiasm of a man who had finally found his calling.


To understand Zebsilanti, one must first understand the law enforcement apparatus of Ypsilanti Township—a phrase that here means “the absence of law enforcement covered by a gossamer tissue of paperwork.”

The Township had no police department. This was a point of civic pride, in the same way that a man who has sold his car might speak proudly of his “reduced carbon footprint.” Instead, residents paid taxes to Washtenaw County, which in turn dispatched Sheriff’s deputies to respond to calls.

“We’ve chosen a regional approach to public safety,” Peb Stumbles had explained, in one of her rare public statements. “It’s more efficient.”

“Efficient for whom?” a resident had asked.

“For the region.”

The system worked as follows:

  1. A resident would witness or experience a crime.
  2. The resident would call 911.
  3. A dispatcher would take the information and assign a priority level, ranging from “Urgent” to “Eventual” to “Theoretical.”
  4. Between forty-five minutes and four hours later, a deputy would arrive.
  5. The deputy would take notes.
  6. The deputy would leave.
  7. Nothing would happen.

The notes themselves were a marvel of bureaucratic impressionism. Deputy Marcus VanDamn—Badge #4471, known locally as “The Stenographer of Sorrows”—had developed a particular style that residents had come to recognize. His reports read like haiku composed by a man who had stopped listening after the first sentence:

Complainant states: neighbor “threatened” him.
Neighbor states: did not.
No witnesses. No injuries.
Civil matter. Unfounded.

It did not matter that the “threat” had been delivered via bullhorn at 3 AM. It did not matter that seventeen neighbors had signed a petition. It did not matter that someone had uploaded burned a CD with a video entitled “YPSI TOWNSHIP PART 47.” Deputy VanDamn had a form. The form had boxes. The boxes did not include “watched the video.”

“But there’s footage,” residents would say.

“I can note that footage exists,” Deputy VanDamn would reply, writing footage allegedly exists in Box 14-C, which was labeled “Additional Comments (Optional).”

The footage was never watched. Box 14-C was never read. The reports were filed in a building in Ann Arbor where they achieved a kind of quantum immortality—simultaneously existing and not existing, referenced in theory but never consulted in practice.

Residents had attempted to raise this issue with Township leadership. They had written letters. They had attended the 4:30 PM meetings (those who could). They had spoken during the public comment period, which was limited to three minutes per speaker and which Peb Stumbles monitored with a stopwatch.

“Your three minutes are up,” she would say, at exactly three minutes, regardless of whether the speaker was mid-sentence.

“But I haven’t finished—”

“You’ve finished your three minutes.”

The letters were acknowledged with form responses. The public comments were noted in the minutes, which no one read. And the Sheriff’s deputies continued to arrive, take notes, and achieve nothing—a service for which Township residents paid approximately $2.3 million annually in taxes to Washtenaw County.

“What do we get for that $2.3 million?” a resident had asked, at a board meeting.

“Regional law enforcement services,” Peb Stumbles had replied.

“But they don’t do anything.”

“They respond to calls.”

“And then they don’t do anything.”

“That’s a matter for the Sheriff’s Office, not the Township.”

“But we’re paying the Sheriff’s Office.”

“Through the County. You’d need to take that up with them.”

“How?”

“I’m sure there’s a process.”

There was a process. The process involved attending Washtenaw County Board meetings, which occurred on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 6:30 PM in Ann Arbor—a thirty-minute drive for most Township residents, assuming traffic cooperated, which it did not.

No one attended.

The system continued.


The Animal Control question was, if anything, more elegant in its dysfunction.

Ypsilanti Township had once employed an Animal Control officer. His name was Dave. Dave had a truck with a cage in the back and a genuine affection for creatures that bit him. Dave responded to calls about loose dogs, feral cats, and one memorable incident involving an escaped emu that had wandered down Michigan Avenue with the confidence of a tenured professor.

Then the township did the math.

“Dave costs $47,000 a year,” said Peb Stumbles, reviewing the budget at a meeting attended by herself, the board, and Gerald.

“Dave also handles approximately 400 calls annually,” said a board member who had not yet learned that context was unwelcome.

“But what if—and hear me out—we simply didn’t have Dave?”

“What would happen to the animal calls?”

“The Sheriff’s Office can handle them.”

“Can they?”

“They handle everything else.”

This was technically true, in the same way that a sieve “handles” water.

The motion passed 5-0. It was not a controversial vote. Nothing was controversial when there was no opposition—on the ballot, in the room, or in concept.

Dave was offered a position with Ann Arbor at reduced pay. He took it. The emu situation was declared “resolved” on the grounds that no one had seen the emu in several weeks. (The emu had, in fact, established residence in a ravine near Ford Lake, where it would live comfortably for six more years, occasionally startling joggers.)

In Dave’s absence, animal complaints were routed to the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office, which handled them with the same vigor it applied to all Township matters.

“There’s a dog loose in my yard,” a resident would report.

“Is the dog currently attacking you?”

“No, but—”

“Is the dog rabid?”

“I don’t—how would I—”

“Call back if the situation escalates.”

Click.

The situation, invariably, would escalate. The dog would leave. Another dog would arrive. The cycle would continue. Residents learned to coexist with roaming animals in the same way medieval peasants had learned to coexist with wolves—through vigilance, folklore, and a resigned acceptance that the castle wasn’t sending anyone.

“You could run for Township Supervisor,” someone suggested once, to a resident who had complained particularly loudly about the animal situation.

“Against Peb Stumbles?”

“Against whoever’s on the ballot.”

“Peb Stumbles is the only one on the ballot.”

“So you’d be the second one.”

The resident considered this. Running for office would require collecting signatures, filing paperwork, attending forums, and explaining to voters why they should choose him over an incumbent who had held the position for seventeen years and who had, by virtue of never facing opposition, never been required to defend a single decision.

“I don’t have time for that,” the resident said.

“Neither does anyone else.”

And so Peb Stumbles remained, year after year, the only name on a ballot that most residents didn’t know existed, for a position that most residents couldn’t define, in an election that most residents didn’t realize was happening until it had already happened.

Democracy, in Ypsilanti Township, was a technical term.


That night, at Al-Kareem’s—amid the garbage that had begun to develop its own political consciousness—seventeen families gathered for what would later be called either the First Continental Congress of Zebsilanti or “that time Baba got too into it,” depending on who was telling the story.

“We pay taxes,” said Omar Haddad, who owned the cell phone repair shop. “For what?”

“Protection,” someone offered.

“From whom? The deputies?”

A bitter laugh circled the room. Everyone had a Deputy VanDamn story. Mariam Khalil’s had involved a break-in, a stolen laptop, and a report that described the perpetrator as “unknown individual(s), possibly male, possibly not.” Yusuf Nasser’s had involved a hit-and-run, three witnesses, a license plate number, and a follow-up call six weeks later informing him the case was “administratively closed due to lack of leads.”

“The leads were on the form,” Yusuf had said.

“I don’t see any leads,” the deputy had replied, not looking at the form.

“Recycling,” someone else offered now, with evident sarcasm.

“Every other week!”

“My garage looks like an Amazon fulfillment center.”

“I’ve started burning the cardboard.”

“That’s illegal.”

“So is letting it pile up until it becomes a fire hazard. Pick your crime.”

“We could vote for someone else,” suggested Mariam, without conviction.

“There is no one else. There’s never anyone else. It’s been Peb Stumbles since I moved here.”

“It’s been Peb Stumbles since before you moved here.”

“It’ll be Peb Stumbles after we’re all dead.”

“Has anyone tried running against her?”

A silence fell over the room. It was the silence of people who had not tried, who had not considered trying, who had accepted the single-name ballot as a fact of nature rather than a failure of civic participation.

“Why would you?” Farid said finally. “What would you even run on? ‘I’ll do things differently’? She’s never had to explain what she does. There’s no record to run against. There’s no platform to oppose. There’s just… Peb Stumbles. Forever. Like the water tower.”

“Infrastructure,” someone else offered, trying to return to the original question.

“What infrastructure?”

A silence fell over the room. Outside, a pothole that had been reported fourteen times consumed a Kia Sportage up to its wheel wells. No one noticed. This was simply how Kias existed now.

“We could secede,” said Rania Mansour, Farid’s daughter, who was sixteen and had just finished a unit on self-determination in AP World History.

Everyone laughed.

“No, listen,” she said, and unfolded a map she’d printed at the library. “The township already sort of seceded from Ypsilanti proper. There’s the city, there’s the township—it’s confusing on purpose. No one knows who’s responsible for what. That’s how Peb Stumbles stays in power—no one can figure out what she’s supposed to be doing, so no one can prove she’s not doing it.”

“Is that how secession works?”

“It’s how this works,” she replied. “This is Michigan. Half the municipalities exist because someone got mad about snow plowing in 1973. We’re just… continuing the tradition. We just need a declaration, a flag, and a name.”

“And what about police?” asked Omar.

“What about police?” Rania replied. “We’re already not getting police. At least this way we stop paying for the privilege.”

“And recycling?”

“Weekly,” Rania said firmly. “If we’re doing this, we’re doing it right.”

“And elections?”

Contested elections. Multiple candidates. Actual choices. Like a democracy.”

The room fell silent. It was the silence of people confronting an argument they could not refute—and the promise of contested elections, which felt almost utopian.


The naming committee convened immediately.

The original suggestion was “New Homs,” which was vetoed by the Syrian faction for being “too on the nose” and by the Palestinian faction for being “not on the nose we wanted.” “Little Ramallah” was proposed and tabled. “Township of Actual Functioning Services” received three votes but was deemed “too aggressive.”

Then young Khaled Bazzi, who was seven and should have been in bed, pointed out the window toward the Ypsilanti water tower—that magnificent 147-foot brick monument to Victorian engineering, which had graced postcards, t-shirts, and one particularly memorable bachelorette party banner with the slogan “YpsiLANTI IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.”

“It looks like a zubb,” he said, using the Arabic word.

Khaled,” his mother hissed.

But the damage was done. The adults stared at the tower with fresh eyes. It had stood since 1890, intended by its architects as a symbol of civic progress. It was 85 feet of brick shaft topped by a 35-foot ornamental cap. It had been on the National Register of Historic Places since 1981.

It was absolutely, unmistakably, phallic.

“Zebsilanti,” said Omar slowly. “Zubb-silanti.”

“That’s terrible,” said Farid.

“It’s perfect,” said Rania.

The vote passed 14-3, with three abstentions from residents who felt the whole thing had gotten away from them.


The Declaration of Independence of the Glorious Republic of Zebsilanti was ratified on a Tuesday, printed on a laser printer with a “LOW TONER” warning, and posted to the township’s official Facebook page, which had 340 followers and had last been updated to announce a rabies clinic in 2019.

The document read, in part:

“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them to a governance structure that cannot collect trash but can absolutely fine you for dandelions, a decent respect for the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to separation. These causes are as follows:

  1. We have been ticketed for grass.
  2. We have not been protected from crime.
  3. We have paid for Sheriff’s deputies who arrive, take notes, and achieve nothing.
  4. Our Animal Control officer was eliminated to save $47,000, which is coincidentally the exact cost of the Township Supervisor’s ‘conference travel’ budget.
  5. Our recycling is collected every other week, which is not how Amazon deliveries work.
  6. Our garbage has achieved sentience and is now a voting bloc—which means it has more electoral choices than we do.
  7. We have been governed for seventeen years by a single person who has never faced opposition, never explained her platform, and never been required to justify a single decision to voters who had no alternative.
  8. Gerald.

We therefore declare ourselves a free and independent republic, subject only to the laws of hospitality, the authority of our mothers, and the zoning regulations we will write ourselves and actually enforce consistently. Our elections will feature multiple candidates. Our recycling will be weekly. Our ballots will contain more than one name.

We have seen what single-name democracy looks like.

We choose otherwise.”

The township’s response was swift and bureaucratic. A Notice of Ordinance Violation was issued for “unauthorized signage” when residents erected a border checkpoint consisting of two traffic cones and a card table offering complimentary hummus to all who recognized Zebsilanti sovereignty.

The notice was received, laminated, and displayed in the newly established National Museum of Zebsilanti, which was the back room of the cell phone repair shop. It was labeled: “FIRST ACT OF FOREIGN AGGRESSION.”

A Sheriff’s deputy was dispatched to investigate. He arrived three hours later, took notes, and filed a report that read: Signage present. Hummus offered. Civil matter. No action required.

Peb Stumbles issued a statement through the Township’s official channels (a mimeographed flyer placed in the lobby of the Township offices, which were open from 9 AM to 3 PM on weekdays, excluding lunch):

“The Township does not recognize the legitimacy of so-called ‘Zebsilanti.’ Residents are reminded that all ordinances remain in effect and that failure to comply may result in citations. The Township remains committed to serving all residents through our regional approach to governance.”

The statement did not address any of the specific complaints raised in the Declaration. It did not need to. In seventeen years, Peb Stumbles had never been required to address specific complaints, because specific complaints required specific responses, and specific responses could be criticized, and criticism required an opponent, and opponents did not exist.

“Regional approach to governance” remained undefined.

The mimeograph was added to the National Museum, labeled: “RESPONSE FROM THE OCCUPIED GOVERNMENT.”


PART TWO: CONSOLIDATION

The Republic’s first year was marked by unprecedented achievements.

A sanitation department was established, consisting of two guys named Mahmoud with a pickup truck. Garbage collection became weekly, reliable, and accompanied by a brief assessment of whether your recycling technique was “disappointing your mother.” Compliance was absolute.

More revolutionary still: recycling became weekly. The Mahmouds collected cardboard, glass, and plastic every seven days without fail. Within a month, garages across Zebsilanti were reclaimed from their cardboard prisons. Residents wept. One man discovered he had a workbench. He had forgotten.

“I haven’t seen this much floor space since 2019,” said Yusuf Nasser, standing in his garage with the expression of a man who had been liberated from forces he hadn’t realized were occupying him.

The Mahmouds also instituted a policy of “active recycling consultation,” which meant they would knock on your door if your recycling was contaminated. This was technically optional, but the knock carried the weight of community judgment, and no one wanted to be the person who didn’t know that pizza boxes with grease stains weren’t recyclable.

A police force was deemed unnecessary after the community adopted what Rania called “the Palestinian Grandmother Protocol,” whereby any suspicious activity was immediately reported to a rotating council of elderly women who would appear at the offender’s door with tea, cookies, and a comprehensive inventory of their sins dating back to childhood. Crime dropped 94%. The remaining 6% was committed by outsiders who didn’t understand that Mrs. Haddad had sources.

“How does she know?” a would-be package thief was heard to ask, trembling, as Mrs. Haddad recounted his 2003 shoplifting incident at a Kroger in Belleville. “How does she know?”

She knew because she knew. That was the system. It was better than Box 14-C.

Landscaping ordinances were reformed under the principle of “Ya’ani, It Depends.” Grass could be whatever height suited the homeowner, unless it was attracting vermin, in which case a neighbor would say something directly like a normal person instead of photographing it from a minivan. Violations were adjudicated by a council of aunties who weighed factors such as: Was the homeowner elderly? Going through something? Recently widowed? Had they brought food when your father was sick? The system was arbitrary, opaque, and somehow achieved perfect justice.

Most revolutionary of all: Zebsilanti held its first election.

The position was Rotating Council Chair—a largely ceremonial role that involved moderating Thursday meetings and deciding when the baklava had run out. But the principle was important. The ballot contained three names.

Three.

Residents stared at their ballots with something approaching wonder.

“I don’t understand,” said one elderly woman. “Which one is the real candidate?”

“They’re all real,” Rania explained gently.

“But which one is supposed to win?”

“Whichever one you choose.”

The woman looked at the ballot for a long moment. Then she began to cry.

“I haven’t chosen anything in seventeen years,” she said.

The election was won by Omar Haddad, who received 412 votes. The second-place candidate received 287. The third received 103. There were twelve write-in votes for “Anyone But Peb Stumbles,” which were counted as valid expressions of democratic sentiment.

The economy flourished. The national currency, the Zubb (exchange rate: 1 Zubb = $1.05 or one falafel sandwich, whichever the vendor preferred), was backed by a reserve of goodwill, community trust, and a truly unreasonable amount of olive oil stored in the basement of the mosque.

International recognition remained elusive, though a confused functionary at the United Nations did accidentally forward Zebsilanti’s membership application to the Committee on Decolonization, where it was placed in a pile labeled “PENDING” that had not been reviewed since 1987.


PART THREE: THE FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS

The first constitutional crisis occurred in Year Two, when Gerald returned.

He appeared at the border checkpoint on a gray November morning, clipboard in hand, measuring tape at his belt, cargo shorts somehow persisting despite temperatures that demanded otherwise. He presented credentials from Ypsilanti Charter Township identifying him as a “Code Compliance Liaison” empowered to assess properties within “disputed administrative zones.”

The border guard—sixteen-year-old Layla Haddad, who was working the checkpoint for community service credit—examined the documents with the gravity of a customs official at a Cold War crossing.

“Purpose of visit?”

“Official business.”

“Specific nature of business?”

“Assessment of vegetation and structural compliance.”

Layla stamped his papers with a stamp she had bought on Amazon that said “RECEIVED” in red ink. It had no legal significance but looked extremely official.

“You may enter the Glorious Republic,” she said. “Please note that our ordinances differ from those of the occupied territories. Grass may be any height. Political expression via lawn signage is protected. And if you cite anyone for anything, my grandmother will find out.”

Gerald hesitated.

“She has sources,” Layla added.

“I have authority from the Township Supervisor—”

“Which Township Supervisor? The one who’s been on the ballot alone for seventeen years? The one no one voted for because there was no one else to vote for?” Layla smiled pleasantly. “We have elections here, sir. Real ones. With choices. Your authority isn’t recognized.”

Gerald stared at her.

“Also,” Layla continued, “my grandmother would like you to know that she remembers when you cited Mr. Mansour for his grass while ignoring the abandoned car on Prospect Street. She has questions about your enforcement priorities.”

Gerald turned around and left.

The event was commemorated annually thereafter as Victory Day, celebrated with a parade down Michigan Avenue (the 0.3-mile stretch that constituted Zebsilanti’s sovereign territory) and a ceremonial burning of a cargo shorts effigy stuffed with obsolete ordinance documents.


PART FOUR: THE Ben LAVEN AFFAIR

Or: The People vs. Four Dogs and the Idiot Who Enabled Them

A Case Study in Domestic Terrorism (Noise Division)

The crisis that would test Zebsilanti’s founding principles—and establish precedents still debated in the Republic’s legal circles (which met Tuesdays at Al-Kareem’s, after the dinner rush)—began not with garbage or grass, but with noise.

Specifically: barking.

More specifically: the relentless, arrhythmic, neurologically corrosive barking of four dogs belonging to one Benjamin Laven, a resident of the disputed border zone between Zebsilanti and the occupied territories of Ypsilanti Charter Township.

The name would prove unfortunate.

Ben Laven—no relation, a coincidence of syllables that would haunt him—lived in a house that had once been beige and was now the color of resigned neglect. The property, which Marwan Jaziri would later describe in his formal complaint as “the compound,” featured a picket fence, perpetually drawn blinds, and a yard that appeared to have been landscaped by entropy itself.

From this compound, four dogs conducted what can only be described as a sustained campaign of psychological warfare against the surrounding population.

The dogs were:

1. Nutslam, a geriatric Golden Retriever who served as the cell’s spiritual leader. Nutslam was blind, senile, and produced a bark that defied acoustic explanation—a strangled, agonized howl that sounded, according to Marwan’s formal complaint, “as though his scrotum had been caught in the door of an F-150 that subsequently drove off, leaving him to vocalize his trauma in perpetuity.” Nutslam barked at nothing, because Nutslam could see nothing. He barked at sounds, at smells, at vibrations in the earth, at memories of things that may or may not have happened. He barked, it seemed, at the very concept of existence, and found it wanting.

2. Skunk, a black-and-white Pomeranian who functioned as the cell’s reconnaissance unit. Skunk’s coloring was such that, from a distance, he appeared to be an actual skunk, prompting at least three neighbors to call the (nonexistent) Animal Control about a “rabid skunk” before realizing the skunk was, in fact, a dog. Skunk’s bark was high-pitched and staccato, a machine-gun burst of indignation that he deployed at anything that moved and several things that didn’t. He had once barked at a garden hose for forty-five minutes. The hose had not moved. Skunk remained vigilant.

3. Minion, a jet-black Pomeranian who served as the cell’s psychological operations unit. Minion’s bark was not, technically, a bark—it was a shriek, a scream, a sound that Marwan’s veterinary behaviorist consultant described as “what I imagine a bird would sound like if it were feasting on Prometheus’ liver while Prometheus was still using it.” The sound was high, sustained, and somehow wet, as though Minion were gargling his own fury. Minion weighed six pounds. Minion produced enough noise for sixty.

4. Bo, a young female Golden Retriever who had, by all accounts, been a normal dog before her exposure to the Ben Laven compound. Bo had arrived as a puppy, friendly and quiet, the kind of dog that neighbors smiled at. Within six months, she had been fully radicalized. Bo now barked whenever the others barked, a convert to the cause, a true believer who had learned that this was simply what dogs did. Her bark was the saddest of all—the bark of a dog who could have been good, who had been good, but who had been failed by circumstance and leadership.

“It’s like living next to a terrorist training camp,” Marwan Jaziri had said once, in the early days, before he understood how apt the comparison would become. “Except the terrorists are dogs and their leader is a blind, senile Golden Retriever whose bark sounds like testicular catastrophe.”

The cell operated in shifts, maintaining a continuous barking presence that military strategists would later recognize as a classic “harassment and interdiction” pattern:

0500-0800: Nutslam’s dawn patrol. Unable to see the sunrise, he barked at it anyway, his anguished howl serving as an alarm clock for a three-block radius. The sound built slowly, a moan becoming a wail becoming a full-throated scream of existential confusion. Residents learned to wake before Nutslam, if only to brace themselves.

0800-1200: Skunk assumed primary barking duties, responding to pedestrians, vehicles, mail carriers, leaves, shadows, and on one memorable occasion, his own reflection in a puddle. The puddle incident lasted two hours.

1200-1400: Reduced activity. Even terrorists need lunch.

1400-1800: Minion’s shift. The Prometheus hours, residents called them. Minion would position himself at the fence and emit his liver-eating-bird shriek at anything that passed. Children walking home from school learned to cross the street. Adults did too.

1800-2200: Full cell activation. Dinnertime triggered a coordinated assault, all four dogs barking in overlapping waves that created a wall of sound impenetrable to human thought. Conversations stopped. Televisions were turned up, then up further, then muted in defeat. Residents ate in silence, chewing grimly, waiting for 10 PM.

2200-0500: Bo’s night watch. The youngest member of the cell, Bo had been assigned the overnight shift, barking at raccoons, possums, and the occasional car with the enthusiasm of a new recruit eager to prove herself. She was good at it. She had learned from the best. Or the worst. It was hard to tell the difference.


Intelligence Assessment: The Ben Laven Compound

The Zebsilanti Intelligence Community (Mrs. Haddad, primarily, supplemented by her network of sources) compiled the following assessment of the Ben Laven operation:

Subject: Benjamin “Ben” Laven
Status: Person of Interest (Noise Crimes)
Known Associates: Four unlicensed canines (see attached profiles)
Threat Level: Elevated (Sleep Deprivation Division)

Organizational Structure:
Analysis indicates a decentralized command structure with Nutslam serving as ideological leader despite (or perhaps because of) his apparent cognitive decline. His blindness and senility have not diminished his authority; if anything, they have enhanced it, lending his bark an oracular quality that the other dogs appear to interpret as divine instruction.

Skunk and Minion function as operational commanders, coordinating daytime harassment activities. Bo represents the most concerning development: evidence of successful recruitment and radicalization of a previously moderate asset.

Assessment:
The Ben Laven cell represents a persistent, low-intensity threat to regional stability. Unlike traditional noise nuisances, which respond to intervention, the Ben Laven dogs appear ideologically committed to their campaign. Nutslam’s continued leadership despite obvious impairment suggests a cult-like devotion among cell members.

Ben Laven himself presents as either a passive supporter or a useful idiot—providing material support (food, shelter) without direct involvement in operations. His repeated claims of ignorance (“I didn’t know they were that loud”) are assessed as either genuine obliviousness or strategic denial. The fact that he can sleep through Nutslam’s 5 AM testicular aria suggests either profound hearing loss or profound indifference. Both are concerning.

Recommended Action:
Continued monitoring. Formal complaint process has proven ineffective (see: 35 filed complaints, 0 enforcement actions). Alternative approaches under consideration.


The Chronicle of Complaints: A Documentary Record

Marwan Jaziri was an accountant. He believed in systems. He believed that problems had solutions, that authorities existed to provide those solutions, and that documentation was the bridge between grievance and resolution.

He was about to learn otherwise.

Complaint #1 (March 15, Year 1)
Method: Phone call to Washtenaw County Animal Control
Response: “Animal Control services for your area have been discontinued. For noise complaints, contact the Sheriff’s Office.”

Complaint #2 (March 16, Year 1)
Method: Phone call to Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office
Response: “Is the dog currently attacking someone?”
“No, but—”
“Barking is not an emergency. This is a civil matter.”
Click.

Complaint #3 (March 22, Year 1)
Method: Written letter to Ypsilanti Charter Township
Response: Form letter (received April 14): “Thank you for your concern. Your matter has been referred to the appropriate department.”
The appropriate department was never identified. Marwan suspected it did not exist, like the weapons of mass destruction that had justified other interventions in other compounds belonging to other men with similar names.

Complaint #4 (April 3, Year 1)
Method: Phone call to Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office (Non-Emergency Line)
Response: A deputy would be dispatched to “assess the situation.”
Deputy Marcus VanDamn arrived four hours later. The dogs had briefly stopped barking because Nutslam had walked into a wall and was taking a moment to recalibrate.
Report filed: Responded to noise complaint. No excessive noise observed upon arrival. One dog appeared confused. Unfounded.

Marwan had begun to understand that the Ben Laven compound operated like any effective cell: it went quiet when authorities approached, then resumed operations the moment they left. The dogs had not been trained to do this. They had simply evolved the behavior through natural selection—the selection pressure being Deputy VanDamn’s four-hour response time.

Complaint #5 (April 4, Year 1)
Method: Phone call to Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office with video evidence
Response: “We don’t accept video submissions. A deputy can be dispatched to observe.”
“But I have evidence. Right here. On my phone. I can email it.”
“Sir, our system doesn’t—”
“It’s on YouTube. I can send you a link. It’s titled ‘THE BEN LAVEN COMPOUND DAY 47.’ You can hear a dog that sounds like his genitals were—”
“Sir, I’m going to stop you there.”

Complaint #6 (April 10, Year 1)
Method: Attendance at Ypsilanti Township Board Meeting, 4:30 PM
Result: Marwan took half a day off work to attend. He was the only member of the public present. Peb Stumbles presided. The agenda included approval of minutes, budget amendments, and “public comment.”

“I’d like to discuss the noise ordinance enforcement,” Marwan said, when called upon.

“You have three minutes,” Peb Stumbles said, starting her stopwatch.

Marwan spoke for two minutes and forty-seven seconds, describing the situation in detail.

“Your time is nearly up,” Peb Stumbles said.

“I have thirteen seconds left.”

“Noted. Is there a question?”

“What is the Township doing about noise complaints?”

“That’s a matter for the Sheriff’s Office.”

“But the Township contracts with the Sheriff’s Office. Don’t you have any oversight?”

“We have a regional approach to public safety.”

“What does that mean?”

“It means the Sheriff’s Office handles enforcement.”

“And if they don’t enforce anything?”

“Your three minutes are up.”

The meeting moved to budget amendments. Marwan left. Nothing changed.

Complaints #7-35 (April, Year 1 – June, Year 2)
Method: Everything available
Response: A vast taxonomy of bureaucratic deflection, including: “This is a civil matter” (17 times), “You’ll need to contact the Township” (8 times, from the Sheriff’s Office), “You’ll need to contact the Sheriff’s Office” (6 times, from the Township), “Have you considered mediation?” (3 times, with no mediator ever provided), “The noise ordinance requires sustained measurement by a certified technician” (once, with no technician available within 60 miles), “Supervisor Stumbles is not available for comment” (4 times), and “That falls outside our jurisdiction” (12 times, from entities that seemed to have overlapping jurisdiction with everyone and responsibility for nothing).

Complaint #35 (June 14, Year 2)
Method: Formal noise complaint with 114 pages of documentation, including audio recordings, video evidence, a decibel log maintained over 90 days, photographs of the dogs, photographs of Ben Laven ignoring the dogs, a spectrographic analysis of Minion’s bark proving it exceeded frequencies typically produced by terrestrial mammals, and a notarized statement from a veterinary behaviorist who had observed (from a distance) that Nutslam displayed “symptoms consistent with advanced cognitive decline” and should “probably be evaluated for quality of life concerns, although I say this based solely on the sound he makes, which is upsetting.”

Response: The complaint was rejected for “improper formatting.” The proper format was not specified. The complaint was invited to be resubmitted.

Marwan submitted a public records request for the proper format. The response, received six weeks later, was a single page that read: “Complaints should be submitted in proper format.”


The Breaking Point

On the morning of June 15, Year 2, Marwan Jaziri had not slept in thirty-one hours.

The dogs had barked through the night. Nutslam had begun his aria at 4:47 AM—thirteen minutes early, a deviation that somehow made it worse, as if even the schedule of suffering had become unreliable. The sound had started as a moan, risen to a howl, and peaked at what Marwan could only describe as “the noise a soul makes when leaving a body that was not ready to release it.”

Skunk had joined in at 5:15, his staccato yapping providing a percussive counterpoint to Nutslam’s melody of despair.

Minion had contributed his liver-eating-bird shriek at 5:30, adding a high harmonic that made Marwan’s sinuses ache.

And Bo—poor, radicalized Bo—had tied it all together, her bark the steady rhythm section of a band no one had asked to hear.

At 6:30 AM, Ben Laven had emerged in his bathrobe, scratched himself, and said the words that had become a kind of dark mantra in the neighborhood: “Keep it down, guys.”

The dogs had ignored him.

They always ignored him.

He had gone back inside.

Marwan stood at his window and watched the door close.

Something in Marwan Jaziri—accountant, believer in systems, compiler of 114 pages of documentation that no one had read—broke.

Or perhaps it didn’t break. Perhaps it simply reorganized.

He had tried diplomacy. He had tried the proper channels. He had attended a 4:30 PM meeting and been given three minutes and no answers. He had tried everything a reasonable person was supposed to try, and he had been ignored, dismissed, and ultimately reported to the very authorities who had failed to help him.

The system had failed.

It had failed, in fact, exactly as it was designed to fail—to diffuse responsibility across so many entities that no single entity could be held accountable, to create processes that existed not to solve problems but to exhaust the people who reported them, to maintain the appearance of governance without the inconvenience of actually governing.

Peb Stumbles had been Township Supervisor for seventeen years. In that time, she had never faced an opponent, never defended a decision, never been required to explain why residents paid for services they didn’t receive. She existed in a perfect equilibrium of non-accountability—the single name on a ballot that no one knew existed, presiding over meetings that no one could attend, issuing statements that explained nothing.

The system had failed because the system was designed to fail.

It was time for direct action.


The Capture

The following account is reconstructed from witness statements, surveillance footage from Mrs. Haddad’s Ring doorbell (which captured a partial view of the Ben Laven property), and Marwan’s own testimony before the People’s Tribunal.

At approximately 7:15 AM, Marwan Jaziri crossed into the disputed border zone carrying: one roll of duct tape, four dog treats (bacon-flavored, high-value), one legally purchased dog whistle, one Bluetooth speaker playing a frequency designed to calm anxious canines (purchased from Amazon, $34.99, 3.5 stars), one copy of the Washtenaw County noise ordinance (highlighted), and one copy of the Geneva Convention (also highlighted, for reasons that would become clear).

He approached the Ben Laven property. The dogs reacted according to their natures:

Nutslam barked at nothing, because he couldn’t see Marwan approaching. Skunk barked directly at Nutslam. Minion produced his signature shriek, which Marwan had learned to endure through a combination of earplugs and spite. Bo barked because the others were barking.

Then Marwan produced the treats.

The barking stopped.

All four dogs—even Nutslam, who had smelled the bacon through the fog of his senility—fell silent and sat down.

Marwan gave them the treats.

The dogs had never, to his knowledge, been rewarded for silence. They had never been rewarded for much of anything except for barking. They accepted the treats with the confused gratitude of prisoners offered an unexpected kindness.

“Good dogs,” Marwan said.

Nutslam’s tail wagged. He couldn’t see Marwan, but he could hear kindness in the voice, and perhaps that was enough.

Then Marwan knocked on Ben Laven’s door.


What happened next was described in Deputy VanDamn’s report as: Complainant alleges unlawful detention. Alleged perpetrator disputes characterization. No injuries. Civil matter. Unfounded.

What actually happened was this:

Marwan Jaziri invited Ben Laven to “discuss the situation” in Marwan’s backyard, which had been prepared overnight. Ben Laven, who had never considered Marwan a physical threat (correctly) and who was genuinely confused about why his neighbor seemed so upset (incorrectly), agreed.

He brought the dogs.

This was his mistake.

Marwan’s backyard had been transformed. A card table had been erected, draped in a bedsheet that Marwan’s wife had tie-dyed for a 2019 charity event and which now served as the flag of an ad hoc judiciary. Three chairs had been arranged behind the table. A single chair faced them—the defendant’s position. And four dog crates, borrowed from the Zebsilanti community center’s emergency pet supplies, had been arranged to the side.

A hand-painted sign hung above the table. It read: THE PEOPLE’S TRIBUNAL FOR CRIMES AGAINST SLEEP.

Below it, in smaller letters: “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied — Also, Your Dogs Are Too Loud”

“What the hell is this?” Ben Laven asked.

“This,” said Marwan, “is a tribunal.”

“A what?”

“You are being charged with crimes against the peace and sanity of the Zebsilanti border region. Your co-defendants”—he gestured at the dogs—”are charged as accomplices. Except Bo, who is being charged as a victim of radicalization.”

Bo wagged her tail. She didn’t understand the words, but she understood that someone was paying attention to her, which was more than Ben Laven typically provided.

“This is insane.”

“This is due process,” Marwan replied. “Something you have been shielded from by the systematic failures of Washtenaw County and Ypsilanti Charter Township—whose Supervisor, I should note, has been the only name on the ballot for seventeen consecutive years, during which time exactly nothing has improved. In the absence of legitimate authority, the people must act.”

He paused, then added: “Also, I want to be clear that this is entirely nonviolent. The Geneva Convention—” he held up his highlighted copy “—applies. You are being treated humanely. There is coffee.”

There was, in fact, coffee. Mrs. Haddad had brought it. She had also brought cookies, because no proceeding in Zebsilanti could occur without refreshments, even one that was technically an extrajudicial detention.

“I’m leaving,” Ben Laven said.

“You are not.”

“You can’t keep me here.”

“I am not keeping you anywhere. You are free to leave at any time. However, if you leave, this tribunal will proceed in absentia, and its findings will be published in the Zebsilanti Gazette”—a newsletter Marwan had founded that morning, circulation: 47—”and posted to the Ypsilanti Township Community Facebook group, which has 8,400 members.”

Ben Laven hesitated.

“The post will include the video compilation,” Marwan added. “All fourteen hours. Titled, I should mention, ‘THE BEN LAVEN COMPOUND: A DOCUMENTARY.’ There’s a whole section on Nutslam. I’ve had to put viewer discretion warnings on it because of the sound he makes.”

“The sound he—”

“You know the sound. Everyone knows the sound. It’s the sound of testicular tragedy, Ben. It’s the sound of a dog whose body has betrayed him and who has chosen to narrate that betrayal at 5 AM every morning for six years. It’s upsetting. And 8,400 people are going to hear it, and they’re going to have questions.”

Ben Laven sat down.

In his crate, Nutslam let out a low moan—not a bark, just a moan, the sound of an old dog settling into unfamiliar comfort. It was still unpleasant. But it was quieter.


The Tribunal

The three judges arrived over the next hour, summoned by a group text that read: Ben Laven situation escalating. Need witnesses. Bring coffee.

The judges were:

1. Mrs. Haddad, representing the Council of Grandmothers and serving as Chief Justice. She had sources. She always had sources. She had also not slept well in twenty-six months, and her sources had confirmed that neither had anyone else within a three-block radius of the Ben Laven compound.

2. Omar Haddad, representing the Zebsilanti business community, which had received numerous complaints about barking disturbing customers at the cell phone repair shop. “People are trying to explain their cracked screens,” he had said. “They can’t hear themselves think. Especially when the black one does that noise.”

3. Rania Mansour, now nineteen, serving as Recording Secretary and Constitutional Scholar. She was taking notes for her thesis, which had expanded to include a chapter on “Community-Based Justice in the Absence of Functional Institutions.”

The prosecution was conducted by Marwan himself, who had prepared a 47-slide PowerPoint presentation titled “THE CASE AGAINST BEN LAVEN: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF NEGLIGENCE, NUISANCE, AND THE BANALITY OF INDIFFERENCE.”

The subtitle read: “Or: How One Man’s Incompetence Became Everyone’s Problem.”

The defense was conducted by Ben Laven, who had not prepared anything and kept asking if he could call a lawyer.

“You may call anyone you wish,” Mrs. Haddad said. “This tribunal has no power to prevent you from doing so. It also has no power to compel you to stay. And yet—here we are.”

Ben Laven did not call a lawyer. He did not call anyone. He sat in his chair, increasingly aware that he was outnumbered by people who had also heard his dogs for six years and who were looking at him with the quiet, exhausted disappointment of a community that had run out of patience.


Selected Proceedings

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT A: Audio Compilation
Marwan played seventeen minutes of continuous barking, recorded between 2 AM and 4 AM on a Tuesday.

The tribunal listened in silence.

Nutslam’s portion—a sustained, wavering howl that seemed to contain within it all the sorrow of a creature who had outlived his understanding of the world—prompted Mrs. Haddad to close her eyes and whisper something that might have been a prayer.

Minion’s contribution caused Omar to physically recoil. “What is that?” he asked.

“That,” Marwan said, “is Minion. He’s a Pomeranian. Six pounds. Sounds like a bird eating a titan’s liver.”

“That’s… very specific.”

“I’ve had six years to think about it.”

“I was asleep,” Ben Laven said, when the recording ended.

“Yes,” Marwan replied. “You were. We were not.

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT B: Decibel Readings
Average sustained noise level: 87 decibels. Peak readings (during Minion’s shifts): 94 decibels. For comparison: a chainsaw produces 100 decibels. OSHA recommends hearing protection for sustained exposure above 85.

“These readings were taken from inside my house,” Marwan noted. “With the windows closed. Minion alone exceeded safe workplace exposure limits. Minion weighs six pounds.

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT C: The Radicalization of Bo
Marwan presented a timeline with photographs.

“This is Bo when she arrived at the Ben Laven compound, eighteen months ago.”

The photograph showed a puppy, tail wagging, eyes bright, mouth closed.

“This is Bo six months later.”

The photograph showed a dog mid-bark, eyes wide, posture tense.

“This is Bo now.”

The photograph showed a dog who had fully integrated into the cell—barking alongside the others, her original personality subsumed into the collective.

“Bo was not born a problem,” Marwan said. “Bo was made a problem. She learned to bark constantly because that’s what the other dogs did, and no one taught her otherwise. She was radicalized, Your Honors. Radicalized by neglect, by the absence of leadership, by an environment that normalized extremism.”

“You’re making her sound like a terrorist,” Ben Laven said.

The room fell silent.

“I am making her sound like a victim,” Marwan replied carefully. “A victim who has become a perpetrator through no fault of her own. If the comparison to other forms of radicalization seems apt, perhaps you should consider why.”

In her crate, Bo whined softly. She had been given a treat. She had been spoken about with something like sympathy. She was confused, but she was also, for the first time in months, quiet.

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT D: The Dogs Themselves
The four dogs were brought before the tribunal in their crates.

Nutslam stared at nothing, his clouded eyes fixed on a point in space that may or may not have existed. He let out a low moan—not the full bark, just a preview, a trailer for the 5 AM feature presentation.

Skunk vibrated with barely contained fury, his black-and-white fur making him look, as always, like an especially aggressive skunk.

Minion opened his mouth and produced a sound that made Rania drop her pen. “Oh my God,” she said.

Bo sat quietly, looking at the judges, waiting for instruction. Of all the dogs, she seemed the most aware that something important was happening.

“These animals,” Marwan argued, “are not criminals. They are victims. Victims of an owner who has failed to provide adequate stimulation, training, or socialization. Nutslam is blind and senile, and yet he has received no veterinary evaluation, no cognitive support, no quality-of-life assessment. He paces the 25 square foot area inside the picket fence, confused, frightened, and he expresses that confusion and fear in the only way he knows how. The sound he makes, Your Honors—that sound is not aggression. It’s anguish. And Ben Laven has done nothing.”

“He’s just old,” Ben Laven said weakly.

“He’s old, and he’s suffering, and you’ve decided that his suffering is acceptable because addressing it would require effort. Skunk has been allowed to believe that everything is a threat because no one has shown him otherwise. Minion—” Marwan paused, searching for words. “Minion needs help. Professional help. The sound he makes is not normal. And Bo…” He looked at the young Golden Retriever, quiet in her crate. “Bo could have been a good dog. Bo was a good dog. And you let the others teach her to be this.”

Mrs. Haddad leaned forward. “Young man,” she said to Ben Laven, who was forty-seven, “do you know what I hear when that old dog makes that sound every morning?”

“No, ma’am.”

“I hear pain. I hear an animal who is suffering and confused. And I hear you, sleeping through it, because his pain is not your problem.” She paused. “My husband had dementia at the end. He would wake at night, confused, frightened. And I would wake with him, every time, because that is what you do when something depends on you. You do not sleep through their suffering. You attend to it.”

“They’re dogs—”

“They are lives you chose to be responsible for. And you have failed them. All of them. But especially the old one, who cannot see, who cannot understand, who can only feel—and what he feels is abandonment.” She settled back in her chair. “The compound is not the problem, Mr. Laven. You are the problem. The compound is merely where the problem lives.”


The Verdict

After forty-five minutes of deliberation (conducted over coffee and knafeh that Mrs. Bazzi had brought, because no Zebsilanti proceeding could occur without food), the tribunal delivered its verdict:

On the charge of Chronic Nuisance: Guilty.
On the charge of Negligent Animal Husbandry: Guilty.
On the charge of Indifference to Community Welfare: Guilty.
On the charge of Operating an Unsanctioned Noise Cell Within the Zebsilanti Border Region: Guilty.
On the charge of Permitting the Radicalization of a Previously Moderate Dog: Guilty.
On the charge of Allowing a Blind, Senile Dog to Suffer Without Veterinary Intervention: Guilty, with a recommendation for immediate action.

The dogs were found not guilty by reason of diminished capacity. “They’re dogs,” Omar explained. “They don’t know better. He was supposed to teach them.”

Nutslam was additionally found not guilty by reason of “clearly being unwell and deserving of compassion rather than blame.” A separate motion was passed expressing concern for his quality of life and recommending immediate veterinary evaluation.

Bo was found not guilty by reason of radicalization. “She was a good dog,” the verdict noted. “She can be a good dog again. With proper intervention.”

Minion was found not guilty but “deeply concerning.” The tribunal recommended a specialist evaluation.

Skunk was found not guilty but “extremely annoying.” The tribunal recommended training, and perhaps therapy for whatever made him believe that garden hoses were enemies.


The Sentence

The tribunal, having no actual legal authority, could not impose fines, imprisonment, or seizure of property. It could, however, impose social consequences, which in Zebsilanti were considerably more effective.

Ben Laven was sentenced to:

  1. Immediate veterinary evaluation for Nutslam, with particular attention to cognitive decline, pain management, and quality of life. “If that dog is suffering,” Mrs. Haddad said, “you will address it. One way or another.”
  2. Specialist consultation for Minion, to determine why a six-pound Pomeranian sounds like mythological torture.
  3. Mandatory enrollment in a dog training program, to be completed within 90 days. Progress reports would be submitted to the tribunal monthly. Bo was to be prioritized as “the most salvageable.”
  4. Daily walks of no less than 30 minutes per dog, even when it was cold, or hot, or rainy, or snowy. Every single day, to be verified by photographic evidence submitted to a community WhatsApp group created for this purpose. The group was named “Ben Laven Rehabilitation Watch.” It had 23 members within an hour.
  5. Soundproofing consultation, paid for by Ben Laven, to determine whether modifications to his property could reduce noise transmission to neighboring homes.
  6. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing, in the form of a written letter to be posted in the Zebsilanti Gazette and read aloud at the next community gathering at Al-Kareem’s.
  7. Probation for the dogs, during which any resumption of excessive barking would result in the tribunal reconvening to consider “more creative remedies,” which were not specified but which Mrs. Haddad implied might involve her sources.

Ben Laven accepted the sentence.

He had no choice. The alternative was the Facebook post. And the audio-video compilation. And the fourteen-hour documentary featuring Nutslam’s testicular aria in full surround sound.

And Mrs. Haddad’s disappointment, which followed a man like weather.


Aftermath

Deputy VanDamn arrived at 2:47 PM, approximately six hours after Mrs. Haddad’s Ring doorbell had captured Marwan Jaziri escorting Ben Laven across property lines.

He took notes.

“So there was a… tribunal?” he asked.

“A community mediation session,” Rania corrected. “Entirely voluntary. Mr. Laven was free to leave at any time.”

“And the dogs?”

“Were provided treats, calming music, and more attention than they’ve received in six years. Nutslam fell asleep in his crate. I think it might be the first time he’s felt safe since he went blind.”

“I’ll need to include that in my report.”

“Please do. Box 14-C has room.”

Deputy VanDamn looked at his notepad. He had written: Tribunal? Dogs. Voluntary. Mediation. Testicular?

He crossed out the last word.

“So… no one’s pressing charges?”

“Against whom?” Marwan asked. “Mr. Laven, for six years of noise violations that your office declined to address? Or me, for hosting a neighborhood meeting in my backyard?”

“You could take this to the Township.”

“Which Township? The one run by Peb Stumbles? The one where she’s been the only name on the ballot since I was in high school?” Marwan smiled thinly. “We tried that. We tried everything. For six years. And here’s what we learned: Peb Stumbles doesn’t return calls. The Sheriff’s Office doesn’t enforce ordinances. Animal Control doesn’t exist. The only thing that works in Ypsilanti Township is the citation system for grass.”

Deputy VanDamn had nothing to say to this. It was, after all, true.

“So we built something that works,” Marwan continued. “It’s not official. It’s not recognized. It’s just… people, solving problems, because no one else will. That’s Zebsilanti. That’s what you’re looking at.”

The report, submitted the following week, read: Responded to complaint of unlawful detention. Upon investigation, determined to be community dispute resolution meeting. No evidence of coercion. All parties participated voluntarily. Refreshments provided. Dogs appeared comfortable. Civil matter. Unfounded.

It was the most accurate report Deputy VanDamn had ever filed.


Epilogue: The Ben Laven Reforms

The veterinary evaluation revealed that Nutslam was, in fact, suffering from untreated arthritis, cognitive dysfunction syndrome, and an ear infection that had likely been causing him pain for months. The pain, the vet explained, was probably why he barked the way he did—not out of malice, but out of discomfort, expressed the only way he knew how.

“You’re telling me,” Ben Laven said slowly, “that the sound he makes—”

“Is a pain response, yes. He hurts, Mr. Laven. He’s been hurting for a while.”

Ben Laven was quiet for a long moment.

“I didn’t know,” he said finally.

“You didn’t ask,” the vet replied, not unkindly. “But now you do.”

Nutslam was prescribed pain medication, anti-anxiety supplements, and a memory foam bed that Mrs. Bazzi insisted on purchasing because “that poor creature has suffered enough.” His barking reduced by 80%—not because he was silenced, but because he was no longer in pain.

The remaining barking was deemed acceptable. It was quieter. It was less anguished. It was the bark of an old dog who was, for the first time in years, comfortable.

Minion’s evaluation revealed that his shriek was related to excitement and frustration, compounded by the fact that no one had ever taught him any other way to express himself. A behaviorist worked with him for three months. He still made sounds that were somewhat upsetting, but they were shorter, less frequent, and no longer evoked Prometheus.

Skunk learned that not everything was a threat. This took longer. He remained vigilant, but his vigilance was now expressed through alert posture rather than forty-five-minute bark sessions at garden hoses. He still looked like a skunk. Neighbors no longer called Animal Control, primarily because Animal Control still didn’t exist.

Bo was the fastest rehabilitation. Once separated from the influence of the others, she remembered how to be a normal dog almost immediately. She stopped barking within weeks. She became, as the tribunal had predicted, a good dog.

She became, in fact, such a good dog that she was offered a position at the Zebsilanti border checkpoint—not as a barker, but as a greeter, welcoming visitors with tail wags and gentle enthusiasm.

“She has diplomatic potential,” Layla Haddad observed.

Bo wagged her tail. She didn’t understand the words, but she understood that she was being appreciated, and that was enough.

Ben Laven read his letter of acknowledgment at Al-Kareem’s on a Thursday evening. It was longer than expected. He had clearly thought about it.

“I didn’t understand what I was doing wrong,” he said. “I thought—dogs bark. That’s what they do. I didn’t realize that how they bark, and why they bark, and whether they bark—those were things I was supposed to manage. I thought I was just… having dogs. I didn’t realize I was supposed to take care of dogs.”

He paused.

“Nutslam was in pain. For months. Maybe longer. And I slept through it. Every night, he was telling me something was wrong, and I just—told him to keep it down.” He looked at the assembled crowd. “I’m sorry. To him. To all of them. And to all of you.”

It was not eloquent. But it was real.

Mrs. Haddad nodded once, slowly. This was as close to absolution as Zebsilanti offered.

Ben Laven ate four plates of hummus that night. Mrs. Bazzi had decided he needed feeding. She had also decided that Nutslam needed better treats, and had begun preparing homemade dog biscuits that she delivered to the Laven property weekly.

“For the old one,” she would say. “He’s had a hard life.”

Nutslam couldn’t see her, but he could smell the biscuits, and he wagged his tail every time she came.


PART FIVE: MATURITY

By Year Five, Zebsilanti had achieved what political scientists would later call “functional anarchism with extremely good food.” The government consisted of a rotating council that met every other Thursday at Al-Kareem’s, made decisions by consensus, and adjourned when the baklava ran out. Minutes were not recorded; what mattered was remembered, and what was forgotten probably wasn’t important anyway.

The Republic had no military, but it did have Mrs. Bazzi, who had once stared down an ICE agent until he apologized for his tone and left without completing his paperwork. She was designated Minister of Defense and given a ceremonial wooden spoon, which she had never needed to use but kept polished nonetheless.

The judiciary had been formalized following the Ben Laven Affair. The People’s Tribunal met as needed, adjudicating disputes through a process that combined Socratic questioning, community testimony, and the implicit threat of Mrs. Haddad’s disappointment. It had no legal standing. It had no enforcement mechanism. It had a 100% compliance rate, because no one wanted to be the person who ignored a ruling and then had to buy groceries while Mrs. Haddad watched.

Recycling remained weekly. The Mahmouds had become local celebrities, their pickup truck recognized throughout the Republic as a symbol of functional governance. “This is what your taxes pay for,” Rania would tell visitors, gesturing at the truck. “This, and nothing else. But this actually works.”

Elections continued to feature multiple candidates. The fifth Rotating Council Chair election had four names on the ballot. Voter turnout was 94%—a figure that Peb Stumbles, still running unopposed in Ypsilanti Township, had never achieved. (Her turnout hovered around 12%, most of which consisted of people who had wandered into the voting booth by accident while looking for the DMV.)

Foreign relations were managed through what the State Department called “aggressive hospitality.” Delegations from Washtenaw County, the State of Michigan, and once, bafflingly, a trade representative from Luxembourg were welcomed with meals so extensive they forgot why they had come. The Luxembourg incident resulted in an unofficial mutual recognition agreement and a standing order for hummus shipped monthly to a small café in Esch-sur-Alzette.

The water tower—that magnificent, impossible monument—remained visible from every point in the Republic, a symbol of the absurdity that had given them their name and, somehow, their freedom.

“It’s still a water tower, you know,” Farid said one evening, sitting on his porch with grass at a comfortable, unsanctioned ten inches. “It still just holds water.”

“Everything is what you make of it, Baba,” Rania replied. She was twenty-one now, studying public policy at Michigan, writing her thesis on “Micro-Secession as Praxis: Community Self-Determination in the Shadow of Municipal Failure.” The Ben Laven chapter was her favorite. The Peb Stumbles chapter was longer, but less satisfying—it was hard to write critically about someone who had never been required to explain themselves. “A water tower. A government. A community.”

“A garbage pile that became a nation.”

“The garbage was a metaphor.”

“The garbage,” Farid said firmly, “was garbage. And then we cleaned it up. Together. Because no one else would.”

Rania considered this.

“That’s going in the thesis.”

“As long as you spell my name right.”

From the direction of the border checkpoint, Bo barked once—a friendly bark, a greeting bark, the bark of a rehabilitated dog who had found her purpose as Zebsilanti’s Director of Visitor Relations.

Someone was arriving.

Probably with hummus.


The Glorious Republic of Zebsilanti persists to this day, a 0.8-square-mile testament to the principle that sovereignty is less about recognition and more about showing up.

Its population remains steady at 1,247 (plus or minus whoever is visiting family). Its GDP is incalculable, as most transactions occur in Zubbs, favors, or casseroles. Its chief exports are cell phone repair, hospitality, reformed neighbors, weekly recycling collection, contested elections, and a very specific form of political satire that requires too much explanation for outside audiences.

And every morning, the sun rises over the water tower, casting a long shadow across a neighborhood that decided, in the absence of functional governance, to become its own.

The flag flies above Al-Kareem’s: a green cedar, a white dove, and a slightly stylized brick tower that, if you squint, looks architectural.

If you don’t squint, well.

That’s sort of the point.


This account has been approved by the Ministry of Information and Shawarma. Visitors to Zebsilanti are reminded that borders are open, hummus is complimentary, recycling is collected weekly, elections feature multiple candidates, Deputy VanDamn’s reports are available for public viewing in the National Museum (Comedy Section), and Gerald is still not welcome.

Ben Laven visits on Thursdays. He brings treats for Bo at the checkpoint and homemade biscuits for Nutslam, who has forgiven him, or at least has forgotten to be angry.

Nutslam sleeps better now. He still barks sometimes, softly, at things only he can sense.

We let him.

He’s earned it.

Peb Stumbles is still the only name on the ballot. We have chosen otherwise.


Cover Art by Oskar Rausch


A Note from the Author

The Glorious Republic of Zebsilanti is a work of satirical fiction. All characters, organizations, and events portrayed in this story are fictional or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental—except for the water tower, which is very real and looks exactly like what you think it looks like.

I want to be clear: I have genuine respect for law enforcement officers. As a doctor, I rub shoulders with police regularly in the hospital. I’ve seen them at their best—compassionate, professional, doing hard work that most people couldn’t stomach. And here’s the thing: the deputies responded to every single one of my calls. Every one. They showed up, they listened, they did everything they could within a system that tied their hands. They couldn’t wave a magic wand and make my problems disappear, but they tried. The satire in this story, as in previous stories, isn’t aimed at them.

It’s aimed at systems. Systems that diffuse responsibility until no one is accountable. Systems that create processes designed to exhaust complainants rather than solve problems. Systems that make it easier to cite someone for grass than to address issues that actually affect quality of life. Contract policing sounds efficient on paper, but it means the people responding to your calls don’t answer to your local government, and your local government can shrug and say “that’s the Sheriff’s Office, not us.”

Ypsilanti Township ought to establish its own police department. Officers who answer to the community. Leadership that’s accountable at the ballot box. A department that can set its own priorities instead of being stretched across the entire county. If they ever do, I’d send in my CV—though I suspect “satirist who once wrote 15,000 words comparing neighborhood dogs to a terrorist cell” might not play well in the interview.

I wrote this story because sometimes laughter is all you have left.

After six years of misplaced trust in local government—six years of believing that if I just followed the process, filed the right form, attended the right meeting, spoke to the right person, something would change—I finally understood. The system isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as designed. It prioritizes the trivial and the easily enforced. It measures success in citations issued, not problems solved. It creates the appearance of governance without the inconvenience of actually governing.

So I did what I could do: I laughed at it. I turned my frustration into absurdity, my exhaustion into satire, my disappointment into a fictional republic with weekly recycling and contested elections and a grandmother-based justice system that somehow works better than anything I’ve actually experienced.

If you’ve ever called for help and been told it’s a “civil matter.” If you’ve ever attended a public meeting where your three minutes changed nothing. If you’ve ever received a citation for your lawn while watching actual problems go unaddressed. If you’ve ever wondered why the systems meant to serve us so often seem designed to exhaust us instead—

This story is for you.

Welcome to Zebsilanti. The hummus is complimentary.

— Oskar Rausch
Somewhere in the Occupied Territories

The Last Free Doctor in America

The Last Free Doctor in America

He refused to sign away his constitutional rights. Then he refused to participate in modern life at all.

By Oskar Rausch

November 28, 2025


The houseboat bobs gently in Lake Huron, anchored about 200 yards off a small, nameless island in Michigan’s Thumb region. There is no dock. Visitors must hire a boat from the mainland, navigate past a half-submerged buoy, and announce themselves by shouting. A German Shepherd named Kai will bark—not aggressively, just to establish that someone is paying attention.

Dr. TooToo Medvalli, MD, will emerge from the cabin wearing a flannel shirt with a laminated pocket Constitution visible in the breast pocket. He is 61 years old, board-certified in gastroenterology, and has not practiced medicine in 18 years. He has not had a cell phone in 18 years. He has not used the internet, held a credit card, or maintained a bank account in 18 years.

He has, however, preserved every single one of his Seventh Amendment rights.

“I am aware,” he tells me, settling into a camp chair on the deck, “that this makes me sound insane.”


The numbers are not in dispute. Employees who must resolve workplace disputes through mandatory arbitration win only 21.4 percent of their cases, compared with 36.4 percent in federal court. When they do prevail, their median award of $36,500 represents barely one-fifth of the $176,426 median in court. Perhaps most troubling, researchers estimate that 98 percent of potential employment claims simply vanish—never filed because the system is designed to make pursuing them economically irrational.

These statistics come from Professor Alexander J.S. Colvin of Cornell University, whose research on employment arbitration is the most comprehensive in the field. Professor Cynthia Estlund of NYU Law School has documented what she calls “the black hole of mandatory arbitration”—the phenomenon whereby more than 60 million American workers are subject to mandatory arbitration, yet only about 2,500 employment arbitration cases are filed each year. That’s one claim for every 10,400 covered workers.

The legal scholars have a term for agreements that consumers and employees must accept without negotiation: contracts of adhesion. Sign or don’t get the job. Sign or don’t open the bank account. Sign or don’t use the cell phone.

TooToo Medvalli chose “don’t.”


To understand how a gastroenterologist ended up living on a houseboat in Lake Huron, communicating exclusively through the United States Postal Service, you have to understand that TooToo Medvalli has never done anything halfway.

He was born in 1986 in Hamtramck, Michigan, to Hungarian immigrant parents who emphasized education with the intensity common to families who had sacrificed everything to provide it. He graduated from the University of Michigan, attended the University of Michigan Medical School, completed his internal medicine residency at UCSF, and finished a gastroenterology fellowship at Stanford. By 2018, at age 32, he was a board-certified gastroenterologist with offers from three major health systems.

He was also, by his own description, “constitutionally incapable of not reading things.”

“My colleagues would get these contracts—60, 70 pages—and they’d flip to the salary section, maybe glance at the benefits, and sign,” Medvalli says. “I read every word. Every clause. Every definition in the appendix.”

It was in one of these appendices that he first encountered a mandatory arbitration clause.

“I remember the exact moment,” he says. “Page 47. ‘Any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively through binding arbitration.’ I didn’t even know what that meant. So I looked it up.”

What he found changed the trajectory of his life.


The Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 was drafted by Julius Henry Cohen, a Progressive-era lawyer, and championed by the New York Chamber of Commerce for a specific, limited purpose: enabling merchants of relatively equal bargaining power to resolve disputes efficiently outside congested courts. The drafters repeatedly assured legislators that the Act would not apply to employment contracts or adhesion contracts. Section 1 explicitly exempts “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.”

The Supreme Court has spent the past four decades systematically transforming this narrow procedural statute into something its drafters would not recognize.

Southland Corp. v. Keating (1984) held that the FAA applies in state courts and preempts conflicting state laws—despite legislative history clearly indicating Congress viewed the FAA as purely procedural. Circuit City Stores v. Adams (2001) narrowed the employment exemption to cover only transportation workers, extending FAA coverage to virtually all employment contracts. AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion (2011) held that the FAA preempts state unconscionability doctrines that would invalidate class action waivers. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2018) ruled that employers can use individual arbitration agreements to prevent collective action even for wage and hour claims.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg read her dissent in Epic Systems from the bench—a rare act of judicial protest. She called for congressional correction of the Court’s “elevation of the FAA over workers’ rights.”

Congress has not corrected it.


“I went to HR,” Medvalli recalls, “and I said, ‘I can’t sign this.’ They looked at me like I’d grown a second head.”

He explained his concerns: the elimination of jury trial rights, the restriction of discovery, the repeat-player advantage that research showed systematically favored employers, the class action waiver that would prevent workers from banding together to challenge systematic violations.

The HR representative listened politely. Then she said, “It’s standard. Everyone signs it.”

“That’s not a legal argument,” Medvalli replied. “That’s a description of capitulation.”

He was not hired.

Over the next six months, Medvalli applied to 47 different healthcare organizations. Every single one required mandatory arbitration as a condition of employment. Every single one told him it was “standard.”

“I started keeping a tally on my pocket Constitution,” he says, pulling out the document—laminated now, worn at the edges. Small hash marks cover the inside back cover. “Forty-seven rejections. All for the same reason. I wasn’t refusing to work. I wasn’t asking for more money. I was just asking to retain access to the legal system that the Constitution guarantees.”


The question everyone asks—the question I asked, standing on his houseboat deck while Kai investigated my backpack with alarming intensity—is: Why not just sign?

Medvalli has heard this question hundreds of times. He has a speech prepared.

“In 1992, the year after the Supreme Court’s Gilmer decision permitted arbitration of federal employment discrimination claims, approximately 2 percent of American workers were subject to mandatory arbitration,” he says, rattling off statistics with the fluency of a man who has spent 18 years alone with legal journals. “By 2017, that figure had reached 56.2 percent—more than 60 million workers. The Economic Policy Institute projected it would reach 80 percent by 2024. Eighty percent of American workers, required to surrender their constitutional rights as a condition of employment.”

He pauses.

“At what point does a right that can be forced-waived as a condition of basic economic participation stop being a right at all?”


The dog deserves his own explanation. Medvalli acquired Kai in 2026, shortly after losing his house to foreclosure. (The mortgage company’s arbitration clause had prevented him from disputing the foreclosure in court—a fact Medvalli describes as “darkly ironic.”) Kai is now 17 years old, ancient for a German Shepherd. In his younger years, he expressed his considerable psychological complexity through the systematic destruction of fabric, furniture, and infrastructure.

“He once humped a buoy so aggressively it sank,” Medvalli says, with something approaching affection. “I had to pay to have it replaced. In cash, obviously. I don’t have a bank account.”


The cascade of withdrawals happened gradually, then all at once.

First the employment contracts. Then the cell phone, after Medvalli actually read his Verizon service agreement and discovered that he’d theoretically agreed to waive his right to sue, his right to participate in class actions, and his right to a jury trial.

“I threw it in Lake Huron,” he says. “Kai looked very confused. He expected to retrieve it.”

Then the internet (arbitration clause). The credit cards (arbitration clauses). The streaming services (arbitration clauses). The bank account (arbitration clause).

“Did you know that credit card issuers representing 53 percent of all credit card debt impose arbitration?” Medvalli asks. “Affecting over 80 million consumers? The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau documented this in 2015. Ten years ago. Nothing has changed.”

He bought the houseboat in 2027, anchoring it off a small island because even the mainland marina operators had arbitration clauses in their slip rental agreements. He grows vegetables, collects rainwater, catches fish. He communicates through the U.S. Postal Service, which he notes with satisfaction has no arbitration clause.

His sister, Margaret, visits once a month to bring supplies. She has spent 18 years trying to convince him to rejoin society.

“The Founders would be proud,” Medvalli tells her.

“The Founders used corn cobs,” she replies.

He takes the toilet paper.


Word of Medvalli’s stand has spread slowly through legal academic circles. Law students write papers about him. Constitutional scholars cite him in footnotes. A documentary crew visited in 2031—arriving in an arbitration-clause-encumbered rental boat—and produced a film that premiered at Sundance to modest acclaim.

Medvalli didn’t see it. He couldn’t sign the streaming service’s terms of service.

“It made you look only moderately insane,” Margaret reported.

The film sparked a brief national conversation about forced arbitration. Op-eds were written. Senators gave speeches. The FAIR Act—the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, which would invalidate pre-dispute arbitration agreements for employment, consumer, antitrust, and civil rights disputes—was reintroduced in Congress. A hashtag trended for nearly six hours.

Then everyone went back to clicking “I Agree” without reading.


One letter stood out from the thousands Medvalli received after the documentary. It came from Gretchen Carlson, the former Fox News anchor whose lawsuit against Roger Ailes had been complicated by her employment contract’s arbitration clause. Carlson had found a legal strategy to circumvent the clause—suing Ailes personally under New York City law—and her $20 million settlement had helped catalyze the #MeToo movement. In 2022, she’d advocated successfully for the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, which President Biden signed into law.

“Dear Dr. Medvalli,” the letter read:

I understand your fight. When I discovered what my arbitration clause meant—that I would be forced into the secret chamber of arbitration, and nobody would ever hear from me again—it was one of the darkest days of my life.

But I chose to find a way around it, to fight within the system, to change what I could. The 2022 law that lets survivors of sexual assault and harassment choose court over arbitration—it happened because of that fight.

You’ve chosen to step outside the system entirely. I’m not sure either of us is right. But I’m not sure either of us is wrong, either.

The law I helped pass was called “the biggest labor law change in 100 years.” But it only covers sexual assault and harassment claims. Wage theft claims? Discrimination claims? Safety violations? Still arbitrated. Still disappeared.

Maybe we need both approaches—people like me fighting from inside, and people like you refusing to participate at all.

Medvalli has the letter pinned to his cabin wall, next to a handwritten sign that reads:

THEORETICAL RIGHTS: 100%

PRACTICAL PARTICIPATION IN MODERN SOCIETY: 0%

REGRETS: COMPLICATED


“I am not a model to emulate,” Medvalli says, as the sun begins to set over Lake Huron. Another cruise ship—one of the small Great Lakes tour vessels—passes in the distance. “I am a cautionary tale.”

He is quiet for a moment.

“But maybe every person who clicks ‘I Agree’ without reading should have to look at me first and ask themselves: Is this the only alternative? Is the choice really between surrendering your constitutional rights and becoming this?”

He gestures at the houseboat, the island, the dog now attempting to mount my backpack.

“If the answer is yes—if the system has been designed so that the only way to preserve your rights is to withdraw from society entirely—then at least people should know that’s the choice they’re making. At least it shouldn’t be done in ignorance, buried in fine print, invisible and unexamined.”

Kai successfully mounts the backpack. Medvalli doesn’t apologize.

“He does that,” he says.


Federal Judge William G. Young once wrote that the rise of forced arbitration represents “among the most profound shifts in our legal history. Ominously, business has a good chance of opting out of the legal system altogether and misbehaving without reproach.”

Proponents argue that arbitration is faster and cheaper than litigation. The Chamber of Commerce claims consumers win more often in arbitration and receive comparable awards. But these arguments ignore what researchers call “the denominator problem”: they examine only the tiny fraction of claims that make it to arbitration, not the 98 percent that disappear. They ignore the repeat-player advantage that systematically favors corporations. They ignore that a system designed to be fast and cheap is worthless if it deters virtually all claims from being filed.

The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases. The Founders understood that this right served as a critical check on concentrated power. When corporations can compel their employees and customers to surrender this right as a condition of employment or commerce, they have effectively nullified a constitutional protection for the vast majority of Americans.

TooToo Medvalli knows all of this. He has had 18 years to read about it, think about it, write letters to congressmen about it.

None of it has changed anything.


As I motor back to the mainland, I pass the spot where the buoy used to be—the one Kai allegedly sank. The sun is setting, painting Lake Huron in shades of orange and pink. It is, objectively, beautiful.

My phone buzzes. A notification from my bank: updated terms of service. Would I like to review them?

I think about Medvalli, alone on his houseboat, communicating through letters, preserving his theoretical rights while the world clicks “I Agree” around him.

I think about the 60 million workers bound by arbitration clauses. The 300 million telecom subscribers. The 80 million credit card holders. The 98 percent of claims that simply vanish.

I think about whether rights that can be forced-waived are really rights at all.

Then I click “I Agree” without reading.

I have a mortgage to pay.


Oskar Rausch is a researcher at the Make America Constitutional Again Institute (MACAI) in San Juan, Puerto Rico. He can be contacted at oskar.rausch@proton.me


Editor’s Note

The statistics cited in this article are drawn from peer-reviewed research, including:

  • Alexander J.S. Colvin, “An Empirical Study of Employment Arbitration,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2011)
  • Cynthia Estlund, “The Black Hole of Mandatory Arbitration,” North Carolina Law Review (2018)
  • Katherine V.W. Stone & Alexander J.S. Colvin, “The Arbitration Epidemic,” Economic Policy Institute (2015)
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Arbitration Study: Report to Congress” (2015)

Dr. TooToo Medvalli is a fictional character who first appeared in “Cruise Ship Doctor” (2025). This article is a work of satirical fiction. All constitutional principles cited are real. All absurdity is intentional.